staff reporter raipur, in another major development linked with mahadev online gambling app, a team of pratapgarh district police from rajasthan arrested mrigank mishra from chhatrapati shivaji maharaj international airp
Delhi High Court refuses to entertain PIL for door-to-door vaccination citing emergency situation - One of the judges said that his doctor said that it was better to take the vaccine at a medical centre that will have facilities in case of emergency.
Source:
Highlights
No door-to-door vaccination, Delhi HC has rejected a plea filed by a final year law student
A bench of Justices Rajiv Sahai Endlaw and Amit Bansal said it appeared that the PIL has been filed for publicity rather than doing any good to the society.
New Delhi: The Delhi High Court has refused to entertain a plea seeking direction to the Centre and AAP government to relax the age criterion and allow door-to-door COVID-19 vaccination. The plea also called for allowing more private sector participation in the drive.
A bench of Justices Rajiv Sahai Endlaw and Amit Bansal said it appeared that the public interest litigation (PIL) has been filed for publicity rather than doing any good to the society.
The bench said it appears that unless the availability of vaccines is more than what can be administered, there is no need for the petitioner to even seek relief of widening of the vaccination drive. The court said it appeared that the petitioner has not done proper homework and that it showed the shallowness with which the petition has been filed for the sake of publicity.
Share This -
x
Hearing a final year law student of Campus Law Centre, New Delhi who approached court seeking door-to-door Covid-19 vaccination, the Delhi High Court asked the student if his institution was not keeping him busy enough, when the petitioner was unable to present the court with data on the issue as enquired during the hearing.
The court said, It seems Campus Law Centre is not keeping you busy, without going through the whole facts, you have filed a PIL?
The matter was listed before the Division Bench of Justices Vipin Sanghi and Rekha Palli, however was heard by Justices Rajiv Sahai Endlaw and Amit Bansal in the former bench s absence.