President not to go somewhere is often a guarantee that he will go there especially if its a democrat doing the asking what he wanted to do was to come here and to take credit for the Law Enforcement effort as you can see there are a number of Police Vehicles down there at the end of the road right there which tells you that he did leave a city divided whats happened is that a couple of Trump Supporters were here in a crowd of black live matter supporters and they came into conflict and the crowd followed to Trump Supporters all the way down there and im guessing that is the conflict that 7 or 8 police cars in a National Guard armored personnel carrier or 2 are taken care of behind me in case youre wondering whats going on there so the president came to praise Law Enforcement for their efforts he came to condemn the black lives Matter Movement saying it was a terrorist organization and he also going to take credit saying that he had helped talk this state in to calling in the National
The island of lampedusa it was 32 women 13 children for men and one body and an identified migrant who failed in their dream to start a new life in europe. They had been on the ways michel a search and rescue ship funded by renowned british street artist banksy named after a 19th century french an artist banksy painted it with a fire extinguisher and tagged it with a modified image of his balloon go. It launch last week from near valencia but the 30 meters ship and its crew of team have been quickly overwhelmed. It came across nearly 90 people floating in a rubber boat on wednesday in 130 more off the coast of libya eventually with an overcrowded did they take the life rafts to the ship and most are in germany for urgent help but received no assistance the reason that there would not ever to move was because they were going to live along to not of a crowd so much and also to have. 5 a place for the body that they found. As the drama unfolded banksy posted this on instagram because i th
Now 75 contained. We do have the forward progress of this fire stopped this fire to give you size it covers almost the full city block with bought with 6 commercial buildings being involved. Do we know how that firefighter got injured in a firefighter was injured in the performance of firefighting operation duties he has been taken to the Trauma Center has being evaluated by trauma. Emergency room personnel as we speak jonathan this fire could be seen across the city what made it so difficult to finally turned the corner on the fire. We know this is something that San Francisco fire trains on is is exactly this. We are a city of redundant Fire Protection systems and we are a city that prides ourselves on training and proactive miss we utilize a number of redundant programs and proactive in systems such as the above ground water system, the auxiliary water system, the High Pressure water system. To combat this fire, including our fire counter. To help us get this fire contained so as th
The first case that we will argue stay is down from versus the usa. Mr. Chief justice, the subpoenas at issue here are unprecedented in every sense. No court hadcases, ever upheld the use of Congress Passed subpoena power. Had toittee of congress the records of a sitting president with a broad swath of the president s personal papers to the let alone purpose of the a potential legislation. There is a reason this is the first time a set has attempted such a gambit. Because, grist has subpoena power, it is subordinate and when that power is deployed against the president , it must yield absent any longstanding tradition or compelling showing of need. The committees consent is neither condition and that should decide this case. The committees contend the subpoenas satisfy the limits this court has always applied to congressional subpoenas. But the arguments would render those limits meaningless. But the arguments would render those limits meaningless. They claim congress can you subpoenas
God save the United States and this honorable court. Chief Justice Roberts the first case we will argue today is case 19715, donald trump v. Mazars usa. Mr. Strawbridge . Mr. Strawbridge before these cases, mr. Chief justice and may it please the court, the subpoenas at issue here are unprecedented in every sense. Before these cases, no court had ever upheld the use of congres subpoena powers to the records of a sitting president , and no one had tried with a broad swath of the president s personal let alone purpose of a potential legislation. There is a reason this is the First Time Congress has attempted such a gambit. Because congress has subpoena power, it is subordinate, and when that power is deployed against the president , it must yield absent any longstanding tradition or particular compelling showing of need. They show neither here. Satisfied, butas thoseguments would limit meaningless. For example, as long as they could tack on a potential for broad legislation. They claim c