report. getting your assessment of this reort. , ., , , getting your assessment of this reort. , ., ., report. obviously, at the stage, onl had report. obviously, at the stage, only had the report. obviously, at the stage, only had the chance report. obviously, at the stage, only had the chance to - report. obviously, at the stage, only had the chance to look- report. obviously, at the stage, only had the chance to look at l report. obviously, at the stage, l only had the chance to look at the summary, rather lengthy report, but it is quite clear the committee seems to have done a perfectly sensible credible piece of work in exactly the way i would have expected because what happens with the committee is people leave their party political allegiances to one side when they sit on it. the evidence, frankly, against mr johnson is overwhelming. it is overwhelming because of the evidence parties took place but what is particularly telling is that when he came to the house and made var
serial about borisjohnson is not he is a serial liar. about borisjohnson is not he is a serial liar, just the truth bores him, serial liar, just the truth bores him. this serial liar, just the truth bores him. this is serial liar, just the truth bores him, this is the party politics. not a him, this is the party politics. not a serial him, this is the party politics. not a serial liar, but the truth bores him? some people might have trouble understanding the distinction. it trouble understanding the distinction. trouble understanding the distinction. it is not. if he chose to distinction. it is not. if he chose to mislead distinction. it is not. if he chose to mislead the i distinction. it is not. if he i chose to mislead the committee, distinction. it is not. if he chose to mislead the committee, may not be chose to mislead the committee, may not be because he consciously chose to do not be because he consciously chose to do so, not be because he consciously cho
junior former members pass, even the most junior is former members pass, even the most junior is allowed to have a pass and a former junior is allowed to have a pass and a former prime minister, if the recommendations are adopted, would not, recommendations are adopted, would not. it recommendations are adopted, would not, it would be rather an eye raising not, it would be rather an eye raising sanction. quite frankly what we see raising sanction. quite frankly what we see here is a committee that is very annoyed at the way boris johnson very annoyed at the way boris johnson. a bit like donald trump, only accept johnson. a bit like donald trump, only accept the results of an election only accept the results of an election if he won it. the fact the committee election if he won it. the fact the committee has had to put up with months committee has had to put up with months of committee has had to put up with months of mudslinging, one factor in the recommendation is an
his defence and his evidence put forward. let us go back to a different gathering which was at the time of the prime minister s birthday party, just bear with me, we scroll through to i think we are looking for point seven gully 48 of the lengthy report published in the last hour point 48. in the cabinet room, pictures of that, infamous occasion for which the former prime minister and current prime minister which she unit were given fixed penalty notices, attended by at least 17 people prime minister rishi sunak. not socially distanced. we note mr johnson did not explain why he believed the event was reasonably necessary for work purposes. in other words, complying with the guidance. 0therthan other words, complying with the guidance. other than to say it took