this is my third go around with waste water. the last was in 2002. that is 10 years ago. i am thinking about the folks in southeast. they have waited all this time. i am looking at this time line. those digesters are about 10 years out. i do not think it is right. i think we have to revisit this and see how we can speed up everything. it just is not right. i think you are right. certainly, if we can use alternative delivery mechanisms , the ceqa process is three years. a lot gets nested. you have to have a certain amount of planning to get into ceqa. then there will be a little bit of sign work afterwards. that is an up-front issue we will have to deal with. we agree and we want to see it happen sooner. it is such an important part of phase one. it is important that the funding be included as phase one so we have an opportunity to throw everything at it to get this to happen as quickly as possible. dan, i am not sure that he mentioned, we will be improving the existing dige
billion. in finalizing the budget for the bayside, we recommend going with the 1.29 $4 billion. the $1.29 4 billion. in this way, as we continue to develop this project, we can determine the right combination of tunnel size and green infrastructure to accomplish our project executive objectives. this would be accomplished through the ongoing watershed process, utilizing the triple bottom line analyses, and the planning and ceqa review that will be undertaken as part of the central bayside project. these analyses will be guided by the permit negotiations that will begin this fall, and of course, the performance from the green infrastructure or the invitation projects. this project has a total of one $1.29 4 billion and a total impact of 20 two dollars per month per average bill. when we move to the west side, we focus on the csd discharges along ocean beach, lincoln way, the 70 vicente and merced. we had an average discharge our current of 3 per year to the bathing bea
is this going to be a bond issue? multiple bonds. it seems to me that our interest should not be, and this is going to sound not correct, but are interested should not be the feedback from the rate payers. i think our interest should be an hour process should be the education, getting those people to one of the treatment plants or something on television to educate. anyone being educated would understand that this has to be done. that is going to be our main pursuit. the broader education thing makes perfect sense. a lot of discussion whether we thought we should have focus groups with everyone or just ratepayers. we are anticipating having bonds. this commission can propose the sale of those bonds and the board can approve them without going to the voters. we thought it was much more reasonable to take a look at what the rate payers think as opposed to all of the renters who do not pay the bill directly, who would have to vote on something. if that strategy changes, th
they are working with me on a day-to-day basis. we will have a team of communications people who are assisting us. what is different about today is that we have a resolution and potential action for the commission. we are recommending that you approve the resolution. this would move us to endorsing the ssip revised goals and level of service. it would validate the $6.9 billion program and authorize us to move forward with planning and development of the projects there were included in the phase one slides that we talked to you about at a cost of $2.7 billion. president moran: that resolution is in front of us. i know we have people who want to talk to this item. before we get to that, can i have a motion. it is in front of us. on our speakers, i have can i say one last thing? i want to also thank it is hard to express the amount of teamwork that has gone into this. behind me, we have a whole bundle of people who have helped and the leadership of general manager harringt
strategies of the collection system. we start with the four hundred million dollar commitment that we have made. we re looking at $57 million for the eight early implantation projects that will be implemented across the city. we re also going to have $6 million committed to ongoing citywide planning. that will leverage the results of additional projects, and identify additional city projects that warrant implementation. you can see the allocation of the $51 million and the $13 million to the central bayside and the west side pomp station projects, with the remaining two hundred $73 million available for projects $two hundred 73 million available for projects throughout the city. these projects would have an impact of $5 per month on the average repair bill. in summary, when we presented our final costs at the end of workshops 1 and 2, we identified about $3.9 billion for treatment costs, and about two $0.7 billion for system collection costs for a total of the $6.998 billio