and the who technical lead for the pandemic. what i know is that international team of amazing scientists, from all over the world, went into better understand the origins of sars cov z. they had a mandate to study and to learn from the chinese counterparts what they were willing to share with them. and then you see the report that was out. the report is several hundred pages long and there is a lot of information on the molecular epee, and the animal s susceptibility, and very little on the lab. it wasn t a mandate to begin with to cover that in full. they didn t have the full capacity to do lab audits. they did include it in there and they made their assessments. clearly, there is much more work that needs to be done for the lab hypotheses. do you sort of stand by your extremely unlikely categorisation? do i stand by it? yeah. i still think. so, obviously the exact wording has gone viral.
and to virus. they had a mandate to study and to team virus. they had a mandate to study and to learn from the chinese counterparts what they were willing to share counterparts what they were willing to share with them. and then you see the report to share with them. and then you see the report that was out. they reported the report that was out. they reported several hundred pages long and is reported several hundred pages long and is a reported several hundred pages long and is a lot reported several hundred pages long and is a lot of information on the molecular and is a lot of information on the molecular epee, and the animal s susceptibility, and very little on the laboratory. it wasn t a mandate to begin the laboratory. it wasn t a mandate to begin with to cover that in full. dating to begin with to cover that in full. dating didn t have the full capacity is to do dating didn t have the full capacity is to do laboratory audits. they did in there is to do lab
of information on the molecular epee, and the animal s susceptibility, and very little on the lab. it wasn t a mandate to begin with to cover that in full. they didn t have the full capacity to do lab audits. they did in there and they made their assessments. clearly, there is much more work that needs to be done for the lab hypotheses. do you sort of stand by your extremely unlikely categorisation? do i stand by it? yeah. i still think. so, obviously the exact wording has gone viral. so, had we known that, then maybe that exact wording would have been a little bit more careful. like just unlikely as opposed to extremely? maybe. if that would take the sting out, yes. i would not mind saying that. both professor koopmans