and to virus. they had a mandate to study and to team virus. they had a mandate to study and to learn from the chinese counterparts what they were willing to share counterparts what they were willing to share with them. and then you see the report to share with them. and then you see the report that was out. they reported the report that was out. they reported several hundred pages long and is reported several hundred pages long and is a reported several hundred pages long and is a lot reported several hundred pages long and is a lot of information on the molecular and is a lot of information on the molecular epee, and the animal s susceptibility, and very little on the laboratory. it wasn t a mandate to begin the laboratory. it wasn t a mandate to begin with to cover that in full. dating to begin with to cover that in full. dating didn t have the full capacity is to do dating didn t have the full capacity is to do laboratory audits. they did in there is to do lab
command. but having said that, it was a good group of scientists. i think there is a question of why do we i think there is a question of why do we need i think there is a question of why do we need to know this and how do we move do we need to know this and how do we move forward? politically there are huge we move forward? politically there are huge ramifications for the consequences. i m less interested in that and consequences. i m less interested in that and more interested in preventing scientifically something of this preventing scientifically something of this happening again. if there was a of this happening again. if there was a laboratory leak, how do we have was a laboratory leak, how do we have better procedures? if it was a natural have better procedures? if it was a natural origin, we have to look at where natural origin, we have to look at where it natural origin, we have to look at where it was, was it farming? was it keeping where it was, was it
novel the scientific for the origins of novel pathogens. what this scientific advisory will do will set ”p scientific advisory will do will set up a framework to articulate what needs up a framework to articulate what needs to up a framework to articulate what needs to be done each and every time there needs to be done each and every time there is needs to be done each and every time there is an needs to be done each and every time there is an emergence, or re emergence, one of these high threat re emergence, one of these high threat pathogens, so there is a standardised approach each time when this happens because unfortunately it will this happens because unfortunately it will happen again. the this happens because unfortunately it will happen again. it will happen again. the who has named the team it will happen again. the who has named the team of it will happen again. the who has named the team of 26 it will happen again. the who has named the team of 26 scien
university of edinburgh medical schoot school. looking at the pieces school. looking at the pieces of evidence we have already in trying to connect the dots. have already in trying to connect the dots, it looks like it was not bioengineered. it was a natural origin bioengineered. it was a natural origin but bioengineered. it was a natural origin but it could have happened through origin but it could have happened through a origin but it could have happened through a laboratory accident, a laboratory through a laboratory accident, a laboratory leak, as you say, because when laboratory leak, as you say, because when it laboratory leak, as you say, because when it emerged so close to the wuhan when it emerged so close to the wuhan institute of urology, which is a level wuhan institute of urology, which is a level four wuhan institute of urology, which is a level four laboratory, the highest level of a level four laboratory, the highest level of experiments with danger