I dont think theres anything brazenly irresponsible about advocating for us having a deterrent to nuclear war. What the purpose of my remarks was, we need to make it clear to our adversaries, russia in particular, if we use Nuclear Weapon, he will pay an enormous price for it. I cant believe the gentle lady as opposed to that. The goal of all of this is to stop anybody from thinking they under any circumstances, to have a good outcome for them. My point on the deterrence is the russians will launch the low yield and if they dont have one they know we wont do anything because we wont want to be disproportional. It implies a low yield nuke. If this is launched. It will set off and instructive war. We want to discourage them from thinking about launching it. In that regard, nothing wrong with making it clear to our adversaries you launch Nuclear Weapon we will consider nuclear war. We have all the options on the table. I will point out as Mister Cooper pointed out we have a low yield Nucl
Noncontroversial. Its actually not even making a determination about the war on iran with this body to decide the matters of war and peace with article one of the constitution. Even this president has recognized that weve spent 7 trillion in endless wars as he put it in at least and it hasnt advanced our own interest as articulated by this administration which worries that china is our greatest rival. To put it in some perspective 24 of the world gdp, china is about 15 and iran is. 55 . Historians will wonder what we e were doing in the region that is a council of 3. 5 of global gdp if the focus is how to get ahead of china. There is a reason that they havent been in the war since 1979 and has been devoting its resources to building its economy. For this amendment is to reassert our Constitutional Values but its also to prevent another strategic blunder we will go to seniority to mr. Conaway. Thank you mr. Chairman. Confident you can do it in three. The amendment would talk about is cr
Use of his powers under the war powers act. This amendment should be noncontroversial. Its actually not even making a determination about the war on iran with this body to decide the matters of war and peace with article one of the constitution. Even this president has recognized that weve spent 7 trillion in endless wars as he put it in at least and it hasnt advanced our own interest as articulated by this administration which worries that china is our greatest rival. To put it in some perspective 24 of the world gdp, china is about 15 and iran is. 55 . Historians will wonder what we e were doing in the region that is a council of 3. 5 of global gdp if the focus is how to get ahead of china. There is a reason that they havent been in the war since 1979 and has been devoting its resources to building its economy. For this amendment is to reassert our Constitutional Values but its also to prevent another strategic blunder we will go to seniority to mr. Conaway. Thank you mr. Chairman. C
react to fast-moving markets with dynamic charting and a futures ladder that lets you place, flatten, or reverse orders so you won t miss an opportunity hi, i m tony hawk, and like many of you, i take a statin to reduce cholesterol, but statins can also deplete coq10 levels. that s why my doctor recommended qunol coq10. qunol has the number one cardiologist recommended form of coq10. qunol. the brand i trust. just a note on that last piece from selina wang following her nearly every move. we just learned that halfway through their piece, as it was airing in china, government censors blocked our signal. we will keep on reporting from there. turning now to memphis, tennessee, late today, funeral arrangements were made public in the death of tyre nichols. for next wednesday. the black man died two weeks ago during a conversation with police during a traffic stop in memphis, tennessee. according to a an autopsy commissioned by attorneys for the the memphis police departm
economically, money has its own. logic follows through today with the amount of money that china, because they have a stable government in russia. when russia simply said, okay, you want, well, what back up now, so strong, weaker. so you know, they re unintended, constantly on the, on the logic. all the ideas were in the past. i no longer valid. there s a lot of change in racing that changes being very difficult or power. it s like a shock when i ask you something on the issue of russia just to narrow it a little bit because you re already paying to get very broad and pretty complex picture for our audience. but if you look at the many of the western media, you ll get an idea that the current confrontation between russia and the west over your brain is one of the major reasons. if not the major reason for things falling apart. i think your partially answered my question, but i m going to ask if any way to give you an opportunity to perhaps to elaborate on that is it indeed th