Screen. So theres the drawing you see the penthouse was moved further east now and so it actually, the door lines up with the west side of the roof deck im asking for is consistent with what youre proposing with 3 modifications because the four feet four feet reduces the roof deck by thirty or 33 percent 3 feet on the west, 3 feet on the north and 4 by 4 foot section at the door to allow someone to leave the penthouse and assess the deck. If you would draw it please i cant see that to comment. She wants a setback on the west side exactly. Along with the chimney yes. I drew it wrong 3 feet on the north side. What is the reason for 3 instead of 4. Just because it reduced the rjd by 35 percent a big reduction so i prefer it to be 25 percent that is what im proposing instead of the 3 feet if the offset the fire code is a nice number for the setback. Im comfortable with that. As a seconder ill agree the setback will be 3 feet from the north and west sides if im correct. Thats correct i thou
Correct. Thats correct i thought you were worried about the odds my reference to the arrow shown the drawing. Okay commissioner Vice President richards and i guess mr. Lindsey want to make sure have you looked at the calculations the reason im asking weve done an audience audit inform september but permanent a training issue and 2 of 5 fails the audit there was indeed an audit i want to make sure your comfortable with those calculations. Commissioners i did not personally review those. As motion id like to ask mr. Lindsey to double check the calculations to make sure it is not a demo. Ill accept that as part of motion. Thats fine it looks okay to me. Call the question. Commissioners, if theres nothing further theres there is a motion that has been seconded to take dr and approve the project as proposed with the modifications to the roof deck only and the railing associated with the roof deck to set it back from the edge of the building 3 feet own the west and north side and for staff t
Commission im Marshall Schneider an architect working with the neighbors with the project proposed the neighbors of the proposed project building there are several reasons that warrant commission bans the commissioners, on that motion related to the design decisions lets examine the size the average size on or of the buildings the same zoning is 2 thousand plus square feet open an average lot size and the largest this on the block is currently 3 thousand plus and the lot size of 3 thousand square feet the proposed project is 5 thousand plus the promoted project is one. 5 the size of largest structure on the block and that is more than double the size of average structure per Historical Planning Commission is not grounds for the exceptional or extraordinary circumstances we believe the sheer size the project coupled with the design that the project sponsor neatest the exceptional or extraordinary the first, the decision the project sponsor made to leave the exit facade massing and this
Believe those people will be my clients im into it so thank you guys. Thank you. Next speaker. Good afternoon commissioners im the Vice President of admission delores Neighborhood Association a 35 year resident of the north mission and a long time advocate the current and sore has on a magnet for years and has seriously impede progress towards the overall good quality of life in the Mission Building proposed for this corner 490 south van ness is very welldesigned and attractive and suited for this intersection filling in this corner will bring Better Energy to a place where it has a beneficial effect on the quality of life on 16 and mission i urge you to give the project our final approval so the developer can break gown thank you. Thank you. Hi so im also in support of the project for all the same reasons that more housing is helpful for the general market im excited for San Francisco to be able to take advantage to take advantage of all the pretty high income people that live here th
The definition brought in Public Comment but we city need more units so i have a quick question on the dwelling x important i want to hear it again. So basically one the method to meet the x power requirement to provide a 25 foot and 25 foot open space area that subsection requires that every level increases that dimension by 5 feet that particular area does not technically meet the requirement. Okay. Thank you. Thank you. I wanted to ask staff a clarification on the motion you mentioned the sequa motion needing to be first. The adaptation of the sequa motion needs to be acted on first. Commissioners youve in the past also called those together if you choose to take them up separately but you can make a motion for all for both the sequa finding and the quality of life at the same time and okay. Thank you. My motion includes both. Thank you. Second in that case commissioners, if theres nothing further to adapt the sequa finding and paragraph the conditional use and commissioner hillis o