Authority. Theyre delivering a turn key of this project and entered into the design can construction phase and thats how were delivering this i still see we need to restore the reserves of two 36,000 for again another set of unforeseen costs to go up. Yes. Construction is currently about 35 complete so there is still a ways to go before its finalized and typically you would budget so there is 600,000 say we decide on that. Then there is another two 36,000 that reserved part of that almost 600,000 and what did they use the researches for additional unforeseen circumstances will we have to fill in that gap again . Thats our obligation under the moa. Yeah but it sounds like were just a blank checkbook and thats not good enough, and i dont think thats precedent for us to say yeah lets go ahead and have these cost over runs go on and on. Commissioner. I fully understand your concern. Just to add a Little Information and clarity. Some of the cost over returns were due to as we enter into the
Asking all these socalled rich people that, please, Pay Attention to those San Francisco an who contributed a lot to San Francisco but who just happen to be lowincome and no income. ~ san franciscans and im asking you representatives to give us three minutes to express ourselves because yall run your tongues and you know you can run your tongues because the tongue has no bone. Thank you very much. Thank you. Are there any other members of the public that wish to speak . ~ apart of this hearing . Please step up. Roberta [speaker not understood] ucsf, campus planning. I just want to submit for the record letters from the mission bay citizens advisory committee, nomad Mission Hiring Hall and [speaker not understood] services. Duly noted. Next speaker. Board of supervisors, [speaker not understood] open government. Just as i spoke earlier, it does offer an opportunity for consolidating 8 campus he and putting them in one location which in the end will provide reduction in parking problems.
This is because we dont receive taxes from ucsf. And unfortunately we have a significant amount of work that we need to do, whether it be infrastructure at mission bay, whether it be Transportation Needs at mission bay, whether it be housing in mission bay and i do realize there are limits to where this funding can go. But i just think that they should be paying the entire amount up froth or paying the entire amount over the duration of the 30 years. I dont see why it should be discounted because the city is not collecting property taxes in any other instance from ucsf and in this particular case our one shot, our one chance at collecting some level of significant revenue is basically turned into a deal. I think they should pay the full amount and thats the reason why because there are no guarantees that theyll move out of the space. And the fact that thats even introduced in any way to make an argument is just i dont support that argument because we cant force them to do that. I think
Good afternoon, supervisors. Bruce [speaker not understood], city ask county surveyor. I think most of you have seen the center here today, but the summation is this on december 4th, 2013 we received two subdivision applications from Neighboring Properties on Mission Street at the intersection with third. First subdivision applications of fourunit air space parcel map proposed to divide assessors block 3 76, [speaker not understood], 738 Mission Street. This property currently houses he the contemporary Jewish Museum and the jesse squared garage. Subdivision would split lot 277 into four parcels. Parcel a would be a portion lying below ground for an existing garage. Parcel b would be the air space above the existing garage. Parcel c would be the space above the Jewish Museum and parcel d would be the air space below the Jewish Museum. The subdivision is necessary to convey parcel a and b to the developer who submitted the second ably indication. Second application would be project 797
The primary intent of the pilot was to maintain ociis ability to maintain infrastructure and Affordable Housing with tax increment even if properties were purchased ore leased by tax exempt entities. Id also like to note that since dissolution, ocii can only use funds that it receives under the pilot to fulfill its enforceable obligations in the south which again are Affordable Housing and infrastructure. Next some background on ucsf and the proposed transaction. As traditionally mentioned ucsf currently controls 57 acres in mission bay for its campus and Medical Center sites. The university is now proposing to acquire blocks 33 and 34 from sales force and develop up to 500,000 square feet of office space and related parking. Under the california constitution, university is exempt from local land use and redevelopment regulations and from local property taxes. However, ucsf is subject to thirdparty contractual obligationses that run with the land, in this case the south opa and the pil