seems like sent this polling data over the russians is clearly disturbing, and i m giving a legal analysis to this. and robby, you re making political statements. and i get that. that s what you do. here s what s odd here s what s odd from a counterintelligence perspective. if we were to take rudy giuliani at his word that the president didn t know anything about what paul manafort was doing, the reaction after the fact to that information being revealed publicly has been sort of odd, because the reaction hasn t been boy, i would have never wanted my campaign chairman to be coordinating or to be providing information about my campaign. yeah. to a foreign power that has adversarial interests to the united states of america. so that reaction is odd. it s clear that rudy giuliani is trying to limit the scope of what people think the president has exposure to, but on the
writes. the misinterpretation has changed. the point is i represent the president, not the campaign. but from both perspectives, there is no involvement in collusion with russians. on the e-mail hack, the only possible crime. okay. that s gaslighting or smoke blowing. the misinterpretation hasn t changed, whatever that even means. the story, the narrative from giuliani, that is what has changed. and this whole rudy round-about routine is not knew. he s done it before when trying to get ahead of some damaging yet unseen piece of news. here it is where donald trump was deeply involved in the payoff to stormy daniels during the campaign. it s not campaign money, no campaign finance violation. they funneled it through a law firm. funnel it through a law firm and the president repaid it. oh, i didn t know. he did? yep. oh. was his latest statement last night to chris on collusion something like that, what the nixon white house once referred to as a modified limited hangout? was
counterintelligence perspective. if we were to take rudy giuliani at his word that the president didn t know anything about what paul manafort was doing, the reaction after the fact to that information being revealed publicly has been sort of odd, because the reaction hasn t been boy, i would have never wanted my campaign chairman to be coordinating or to be providing information about my campaign. yeah. to a foreign power that has adversarial interests to the united states of america. so that reaction is odd. it s clear that rudy giuliani is trying to limit the scope of what people think the president has exposure to, but on the conspiracy point that jim mentioned earlier, the entire special counsel s theory of the case is that the russian influence effort was to was conspiracy to defraud the united states. and so anything that falls under the russian influence activities that campaign personnel,
were looking for dirt on me every day. i mean, that s what you do. maybe you shouldn t, but you do it. nothing illegal about that. and even if it comes from a russian or a german or an american, it doesn t matter. germans, russian, it doesn t matter. yet he later circled back again to no collusion, period. and then he circled back on tv last night, tried to square the circumstance well a quote today, tweeting my statements on collusion haven t changed, he writes. the misinterpretation has changed. the point is i represent the president, not the campaign. but from both perspectives, there is no involvement in collusion with russians. on the e-mail hack, the only possible crime. okay. that s gaslighting or smoke blowing. the misinterpretation hasn t changed, whatever that even means. the story, the narrative from july july, that is what has changed. and this whole rudy round-about routine is not knew. he s done it before when trying to get ahead of some damaging yet unseen piece of new