The present dejesus, here. Melara, here. Hing, here. Commissioner turman you have a quorum also with us tonight is the interim chief of police 20 chaplin and the director of the Occ Joyce Hicks all right. Good evening everyone. Members of the public, ladies and gentlemen and people of San Francisco. Thank you so much for raving the inclement weather and coming out tonight to the regular meeting wednesday, january 18, 2017 of the San Francisco Police Commission. I think we will jump right into the first item item 1 consent calendar received an file in San Francisco Police Commission report on disciplinary actions Fourth Quarter 2016. All right. Colleagues, this falls under the nobodys perfect heading. Although we discussed this last week and there is no need to have an additional discussion, what we didnt do is what her chair the meeting last week, whoever that was, forgot to take a vote. So i believe that can be a hand vote and need not be a roll call vote. Correct . All right. So we h
Quorum also with us tonight is the interim chief of police 20 chaplin and the director of the Occ Joyce Hicks all right. Good evening everyone. Members of the public, ladies and gentlemen and people of San Francisco. Thank you so much for raving the inclement weather and coming out tonight to the regular meeting wednesday, january 18, 2017 of the San Francisco Police Commission. I think we will jump right into the first item item 1 consent calendar received an file in San Francisco Police Commission report on disciplinary actions Fourth Quarter 2016. All right. Colleagues, this falls under the nobodys perfect heading. Although we discussed this last week and there is no need to have an additional discussion, what we didnt do is what her chair the meeting last week, whoever that was, forgot to take a vote. So i believe that can be a hand vote and need not be a roll call vote. Correct . All right. So we have discussed it last week so ill invite a motion on the report of disciplinary acti
Okay, and we will do that, same house, same call without objection. Alder, item 5 . Item 5, introduction of new items. Great, so im guessing that ta staff have already briefed the new commissioners on new items, i dont think well have any today. Well go to Public Comment on item 5. Okay, seeing none, Public Comment is closed. And now item 6. Item 6, general Public Comment. Yes, good morning, andrew here, the haubl u [inaudible] of human heart leads to the recovery of holy heart and [inaudible] with good conscious for once knowing the capabilities of uses and pathways, one [inaudible] wellbeings for the [inaudible] people, helping hands for people in the days of difficulties, the pitching of true principles for their full awakening and turn the dangers to back to forever security are known as [inaudible] for the holy way, such relief acts of mission [inaudible] also promote the free spirit of public nature for the person, [inaudible] one will make use of restfulness, good nutrition, med
A few minutes for an interview. Rublessian leader and the as the fed rats at its meetings today. Is it time to say time to say goodbye to opec . If the oil cartel cannot affect price anymore, what is the . On assignment. Is he may be back in a few minutes, but in the meantime, a very special cohost today. Of weisenthal is the editor bloomberg markets, but that is not why hes on. Your hair looks so good. To matt miller, obviously fantastic. But standalone, it still looks good. Its time to start the top business stories of the morning. We have seen some very big swings in the ruble today, but nothing like yesterday. The ruble soared more than 8 at the open, fell back, and now again it is strengthening against the u. S. Dollar. Russia intervened for the second day in a row, buying rubles out in the open market. Meanwhile, russia said it will keep well production steady over the next year. That sent oil prices down as much as 3 . West texas intermediate has been trading below 55 per barrel
So this court has routinely cited cases under those customs statutes as illuminating the meaning of the probable cause standard and is therefore illuminating so you disagree with justice storey when he looked at those cases and made the point i just made . You think he was wrong . Theres no doubt in those cases the question the court was ultimately answering is are those customs officers liable . But the way it was answering that question was by determining whether those officers had probable cause. And probable cause is the constitutional standard. Thats why they have subsequently relied on the cases. Can i ask you a question id like you to address for a minute. Assume for the sake of argument i agree with you that a reasonable mistake of law is an excuse but what is a reasonable mistake . Thats what i would like you to address and in particular would you have objection to, it has to be, one, exceedingly rare, two, objective, three it has to be that the reasonable lawyer would think t