there to make them sitting ducks for the president. i think the president is right, win the battle, win the war, then come home. to the symmetry between yourself and president trump on foreign policy is not something i would have anticipated as i reflect in my mind s eye back on those early republican debates, some of which got rather testy and personal between the two of. you first of all, rand palm shouldn t be on this stage. what explains for the emergence of this odd couple relationship? you know, the interesting thing is a lot of people didn t know who donald trump was when he came on the scene. he was fairly new to activity in the republican party. those of us what challenged him and wanted to offer a different vision, we want to act sen chuiate the differences, when you got into the general election you started to find out for war, donald trump was for less than hillary clinton. hillary clinton was always an ironic thing. she was liberal on an economic policy and very, v
like folding towels but there s another machine for that just one of the many highlights from the twenty eight hundred consumer electronics show which also featured. and do backflips. artificial intelligence will remain a major focus of this year s c.d. s in las vegas british firm cambridge consultants is among the more than five thousand exhibitors it s developed to deprave an ai based system for vision the technologies learning how to read blurry images. the machine is essentially creating a new image from scratch purely based on his understanding of what is the real world look like so in a way it s doing something quite similar to our mind s eye where we look at a distorted image through you know kind of glass which might be a pipe but we can kind of construct an arm on what we think the image looks like on the other side the technology would be valuable for driverless cars it could help the vehicles cameras deliver a clear image even when it s raining autonomous cars will also be i
a major focus of this year s c.d. s in las vegas but his firm cambridge consultants is among the more than five thousand exhibitors it s developed deprave and based system for vision the technology is learning how to read blurry images. the machine is essentially creating a new image from scratch purely baseless understanding of what is the real world look like so in a way it s doing something quite similar to our mind s eye where we look at a distorted image through you know kind of glass which might be a pipe but we can kind of construct in a model what we think the image looks like on the other side the technology would be valuable for driverless cars it could help the vehicles cameras deliver a clear image even when it s raining autonomous cars will also be in the spotlight of this year s c e s. on a related note tech rivals apple and samsung are known for billion dollar lawsuits against each other but now they are cooperating on at least one front they ve struck a deal that will s
on five. failing ca is one of the world s most successful teaching. in our special this week we meet him backstage. qatada should know momentum and i m going to enjoy your mind s eye i live in the. public school in sixty minutes w. . how do you. discover your concept discover it with a bomb house. a school of logic after one hundred lives the ideals of the kakapos are more relevant today than they were a hundred years ago visionaries shaped things to come to pass people and as
clearly hit moscow. while the treaty is with the united states and they would prefer to obey it, kline s unfetterred by this same threat. so russia s facing a threat in their mind s eye on two borders we re we ve done anything and china has. clearly there s a concern on that front for the russians as well. the idea of tearing up the treaty, normally when a country either goes against, goes afoul of a treaty that they signeded or obviously violates it, what is the normal procedure for retaliation or to make the next move? is it right to tear up this treaty if indeed they don t react in the next 60 days? i think it s right that we step back and said the treaty is no longer in force, we re going to abrogate the treaty. the russians have violated it. we can show them through technical means and inspection means that they have violated it. at that point, you get them to come back into compliance, which they have. if not, you provide them with a