he describes himself as a progressive independent who caucuses with the democratic party. i am a constitutional conservative. we don t agree very often. occasionally it happens. mark: i would assume like any group, club, organization, there s 100 of you, so some get along better than others. there s these caucuses i guess that you have. these lunches that you have and so forth. give us a little bit of our mind s eye into how this works. i guess there is wheeling and dealing, some senators get angry with senators and some ally with other senators. how does that work? it s a little like the supreme court as we were talking about earlier. there are people who are not at all aligned politically ideologically but get along great. the mainstream media would have you believe that democrats and republicans are constantly at
he describes himself as a progressive independent who caucuses with the democratic party. i am a constitutional conservative. we don t agree very often. occasionally it happens. mark: i would assume like any group, club, organization, there s 100 of you, so some get along better than others. there s these caucuses i guess that you have. these lunches that you have and so forth. give us a little bit of our mind s eye into how this works. i guess there is wheeling and dealing, some senators get angry with senators and some ally with other senators. how does that work? it s a little like the supreme court as we were talking about earlier. there are people who are not at all aligned politically ideologically but get along great. the mainstream media would have you believe that democrats and republicans are constantly at
what do you think he meant by warning shot and what do you think could be on that dvd? honestly i don t want to speculate what could be on that dvd. it would then require me to bleach my mind s eye. what can be on a dvd? images i think that s what he s allu alluding to. i think stormy daniels and michael are very, very good at moving and influencing the court of public opinion. which is teasing and they are masters at it, if trump is the master of the art of the deal, this guy they re the masters of the art of the tease. i said, listen, if the president wasn t the president, he would be asking michael to be
is a warning shot. what do you think he meant by warning shot, and what do you think could be on that dvd, ana? honestly, i don t even want to speculate what could be on that dvd because it might require me then having to bleach my mind s eye. look, obviously what can be on a dvd? images. you know, i think that s what he s obviously alluding to and, you know, making a veiled reference to not so veiled reference to. look, i think stormy daniels and michael avenatti are very, very good at moving and influencing the court of public opinion and doing what trump is so good at doing, which is teasing and engaging directly with the public and communicating directly with the public. they are masters at it. if trump is the master of the art of the deal, this guy s been and stormy, they re the masters of the art of the teeth. i said if the president
whether somebody at the fbi misused the fisa to digging into what carter page, one of the most fringe characters in this whole thing, how can they even in their own mind s eye say this problems the whole thing is unfair? how can they do that? it s a fringe element of nothing. your thoughts? understand what s happening here, chris. mueller may or may not prove obstruction. he may very well have more indictments. he may have more stuff. what is happening a coordinated campaign to cast doubt on the fbi, doj and robert mueller so if mueller does produce new indictments and criticisms of the president, the right wing will say he was compromised from the start. that s not true. none of this stuff is rooted in any evidence whatsoever. these are people making stuff up. i think they re setting up a predicate so if the congress has in its hands and the house judiciary committee whether it s a are led committee or one this