specifically they believe that the pfizer and moderna vaccines were so effective that after just one dose, we should given a shot to as many as possible and come back for a second as more is available. it is an approach taken by our allies across the pobd. while manufacturer wait only about a month in between both doses, the uk extended it to 12 week. and scientific advisers there said that this would provide protection to as many people as possible in the early stages of the vaccine rollout. but the wall street journal published a piece titled u.s. government scientists scepkept krepts skrecht cal and that they are pushing back against the one dose vaccine saying that there not enough evidence for long term protection. among those quoted, peter marx who said that they need to be used to prevent covid-19 and related hospitaliza hospital la death. and also peter hof also said that those clinical trials found a level of one dose significantly less than what they got with two.
Allegedly took place. Brett kavanaugh for his part has denied that any of it ever happened, and so has as High School Friend of mark judge who poured claims was there that night. So that is the sum total of what we know and its still a matter of she said, they said. So without a lot more evidence its hard for anyone to prove anything. But that has not stopped leading democrats from reaching a firm conclusion in this case. How do they know for sure what happened 36 years ago . Because Brett Kavanaugh is a man and therefore he is guilty. Its the y chromosome. Watch as a hawaii and noted geneticist maisie romo describes it. They need to be heard but they need to be believed. Guess who is perpetuating all of these actions . Its the men in this country. And i want to say to the men in this country, just shut up and step up, Do The Right Thing for a change. Tucker did you catch that,
the young woman that he abandoned slowly asphyxiated over a number of hours. Ten years after doing that, he r
i think that is a very positive step. i don t think it will necessary temple of this down in fact i know that it won t but it is a step in the right direction. i think the problem here is that it is hard to change course midstream. this should have been resolved before this began. the judge issued an order on jury selection. the questions were public. everybody knew it was going to happen. this was eminently predictable. so i also have to say, i really take issue with some comments he made today directed at the press. this is not the presses fault it is the d.a. offices fault. can we talk about how to manage the situation? i know that not only is changing midstream potentially problematic, but the information about jurors is something that defendants traditionally get in the process of vetting them, right? donald trump has a very is a very particular political animal. is it problematic to not give the defense, you know,