Keystone, they can have a vote on keystone. Thats not good enough for them. Its simple decision. You think the Keystone Pipeline is complex . Time to stop studying, start building. Good to have you with us tonight, folks. Thanks for watching. Ever wondered what the Republican Partys position on Climate Change is . Let me give it to you quickly, facts dont matter. Ever wonder what its leak in a Republican Caucus luncheon on the famous tuesdays, week after week . This didnt work, this didnt work, this didnt work, we better try this. Thats where they are right now, republicans cant get traction on anything. Even with big oil on their side. Now all week long they have been trying to get a keystone xl pipeline vote, that has failed as well. Harry reid refused, and he used a parliamentary maneuver to block republicans who wanted to sneak a keystone measure into the energy bill. Okay, here we are. Lets try anything we can. Reid suggested an up or down vote with a promise for a separate vote o
Ago. Its just a ridiculous side show. Subterfuge. Benghazi, benghazi, benghazi. Benghazi. Benghazi. The republicans want to make it a political issue. This is a scandal without a center. How many more taxpayer dollars are we going to spend try to prove a political point . Benghazi. Benghazi. President obama this afternoon had his hands full with the fullblown International Crisis. Hosting german chancellor Angela Merkel at the white house to discuss a major escalation in ukraine. Today saw the heaviest fighting in that country since a prorussian uprising a month ago with at least 31 killed during clashes between prorussian demonstrators and Ukrainian Government supporters. But if you are a republican in congress, the crisis is not in ukraine. No, the crisis at hand is the administrations response to the 2012 attack in benghazi. Today, we witnessed a fullblown outbreak of benghazi fever. This morning, the chairman of the House Oversight and Government Reform Committee darrell issa, a ma
Group, the sunni militia effect that theyre bombing in iraq, and they may want to bomb in syria as well. When the white house talks about that group, they call them isil. Lets be clear about isil. Isil speaks for no religion, they have no ideology of any value to human beings. We will be relentless against isil. Isil a lot of terms about isils vision. Isil. When the administration and the pentagon talk about who theyre bombing in iraq right now, and who they may want to bomb inside syria as well, they call the group isil. Everybody else calls the group isis. Why are there these two different names. The group in question speaks arabic, and what they would prefer to be called in english, the Islamic State, so that would be i. S. Frankly i think nobody cares what they would prefer to be called. There is this difference in how they are described in terms of english language acronyms. When they are called isis, that is sometimes translated as an acronym for the Islamic State in iraq and syr
Dirt. This is the fact facing voters. Can a Political Party win the minds and hearts of the country by promising to do nothing . Nothing but destroy the efforts of the other art party to govern. Republicans are rooting for their leaders to knock down president obama. According to a new cnn poll, conducted earlier this year, 73 of republicans hope that president obamas policies fail. Only 14 of republicans hope they succeed. Thats 59 point negative margin. Compare that to how democrats view president george w. Bush in his sixth year, a year after the cias final report that found there were no weapons of mass destruction in iraq which debunk of course the entire justification for the iraq war. Even then, six years into his presidency, 40 of democrats wanted bush to succeed. 51 wanted him to fail. Those numbers are from a fox news poll taken in 2006. Let me go to michael. Theres a real difference facing george w. Bush. By the way, thats with all his limitations. And nasty hatred of the re
President , please dont put america into a constitution crisis. So he wants to encourage the president by threatening impeachment . Thats a new one. And theres more. But youre saying that if he were to do that, then impeachment would be on the table . I think then we have to start to sit down and take a look at that, where would we draw the line otherwise . If thats not enough to bring that about, i dont know what would be. A member of congress is talking impeachment over something the president hasnt done yet . Its startling. But its the sort of thing thats now common in the gop. Today, republican senator rand paul vilified president obama for the same thing, possible executive action in the future on immigration. You cant do it by royal edict. You cant have a king do it. You cant have lawlessness and you cant have a president just say if they wont act i will, i have a pen, i have a phone. I will act. Hes terribly dangerous to the country to allow that to happen. Lawlessness, royal ed