with ceqa is one to make changes or additions to our house. right now the process is just complicated. people don t know what s going on. there is disagreement about that. supervisor wiener s legislation will create an open predictable process to resolve these disputes. it will make it easy for everyday people, not just attorneys to understand the deadlines. it will make the ceqa process open and more clear for the little guys in san francisco, the homeowners who want to make small, important to the home owner improvements to their home. we therefore support supervisor wiener s legislation. by contrast, we re concerned that supervisor kim s legislation might have a negative impact on our members because nearly all the homes in golden gate heights are more than 50 years old. according to supervisor kim s proposal as i understand t the over the counter permits that our members currently can get for minor projects, for example, you know, replacing a broken handrail, windows, lea
we are working on it. supervisor cohen: so how much time do you think you need it? need? i would ask for a month. supervisor cohen: ok. thank you. supervisor campos: thank you. again, to the chair, i am still not convinced. what is it that would happen between now and a month from now that could not have happened in the last month? to be fair, i think we were hampered somewhat by the intervening holidays, which did take a lot of people out of commission, so to speak, so that the correspondence back-and- forth was not as speedy as was hoped. we had difficulty putting together a face-to-face meeting, which is what i think is actually necessary. supervisor campos: thank you. i am still not clear on what the difference would be. thank you. president chiu: further questions, colleagues? at this time, thank you very much. why don t we hear from members of the public if they wish to support the appellant? please step up. each member of the public has up to two minutes to speak
not convinced. what is it that would happen between now and a month from now that could not have happened in the last month? to be fair, i think we were hampered somewhat by the intervening holidays, which did take a lot of people out of commission, so to speak, so that the correspondence back-and- forth was not as speedy as was hoped. we had difficulty putting together a face-to-face meeting, which is what i think is actually necessary. supervisor campos: thank you. i am still not clear on what the difference would be. thank you. president chiu: further questions, colleagues? at this time, thank you very much. why don t we hear from members of the public if they wish to support the appellant? please step up. each member of the public has up to two minutes to speak. 8 no fires shine if moma is gone only darkness every day no fires shine without moma find that moma home. no sunshine when it s gone only darkness every day i know, i know, i know, i know i know, i know, i k
continuance, this came to the land use committee in november, if i am not mistaken. it may have an early december. supervisor weiner: so some time ago. i know at the time there were disputes and the parties were going to have discussions to try to resolve it. so i am a little skeptical of a request for additional time for discussions, given that there has already been quite a good opportunity to do that. i just wanted to put that out there and see what you have to say about that. as you know, there are a number of complex issues and a lot of logistics involved in terms of how to accommodate the hotel operations. the parties have met to talk about some of the specific logistical issues, and have exchanged correspondence in an attempt to reach agreement on some of the other issues. but the reality is these things do take some time. we are working on it. supervisor cohen: so how much time do you think you need it? need? i would ask for a month. supervisor cohen: ok. than
again, to the chair, i am still not convinced. what is it that would happen between now and a month from now that could not have happened in the last month? to be fair, i think we were hampered somewhat by the intervening holidays, which did take a lot of people out of commission, so to speak, so that the correspondence back-and- forth was not as speedy as was hoped. we had difficulty putting together a face-to-face meeting, which is what i think is actually necessary. supervisor campos: thank you. i am still not clear on what the difference would be. thank you. president chiu: further questions, colleagues? at this time, thank you very much. why don t we hear from members of the public if they wish to support the appellant? please step up. each member of the public has up to two minutes to speak. 8 no fires shine if moma is gone only darkness every day no fires shine without moma find that moma home. no sunshine when it s gone only darkness every day i know, i know, i