That is the only point. Sounds like you and i have the same objective. I appreciate the assurance to the Community Members and to us that you wouldnt have put it on here for option 4 if you didnt think it was at least, you know, well within the realm of possibility. And, so, two questions. Would it help us, would it help you in your political and other efforts if we were to change the whereas clause that sort of suggests all of the approvals and funding have to be obtained by february 1st to essentially say they all had to be lined up or, you know, presumed to be feasible by february 1st, number one . And number two, would it help you if, as one of our valued constituents said, that we really change the resolution to say were directing you to make option 4 happen to the extent you can . Or do you really read it that way right now . To the latter, thats what i read and i read it as a direction from the board to make 4 happen. Good. In terms of modifying the whereas to speak to the spiri
On here for option 4 if you didnt think it was at least, you know, well within the realm of possibility. And, so, two questions. Would it help us, would it help you in your political and other efforts if we were to change the whereas clause that sort of suggests all of the approvals and funding have to be obtained by february 1st to essentially say they all had to be lined up or, you know, presumed to be feasible by february 1st, number one . And number two, would it help you if, as one of our valued constituents said, that we really change the resolution to say were directing you to make option 4 happen to the extent you can . Or do you really read it that way right now . To the latter, thats what i read and i read it as a direction from the board to make 4 happen. Good. In terms of modifying the whereas to speak to the spirit of having everything lined up such that we know that, say, option 4 is certain as opposed to every last approval in place, im fine with that. Well, i think and
On here for option 4 if you didnt think it was at least, you know, well within the realm of possibility. And, so, two questions. Would it help us, would it help you in your political and other efforts if we were to change the whereas clause that sort of suggests all of the approvals and funding have to be obtained by february 1st to essentially say they all had to be lined up or, you know, presumed to be feasible by february 1st, number one . And number two, would it help you if, as one of our valued constituents said, that we really change the resolution to say were directing you to make option 4 happen to the extent you can . Or do you really read it that way right now . To the latter, thats what i read and i read it as a direction from the board to make 4 happen. Good. In terms of modifying the whereas to speak to the spirit of having everything lined up such that we know that, say, option 4 is certain as opposed to every last approval in place, im fine with that. Well, i think and
Need to know is around february 1st that we have everything lined up to be able to make this happen. If thats the case, then we can move forward even if we still have a few loose ends to tie up. As we slip much beyond february 1st, were kind of by default making a decision on the currently approved project. That is the only point. Sounds like you and i have the same objective. I appreciate the assurance to the Community Members and to us that you wouldnt have put it on here for option 4 if you didnt think it was at least, you know, well within the realm of possibility. And, so, two questions. Would it help us, would it help you in your political and other efforts if we were to change the whereas clause that sort of suggests all of the approvals and funding have to be obtained by february 1st to essentially say they all had to be lined up or, you know, presumed to be feasible by february 1st, number one . And number two, would it help you if, as one of our valued constituents said, that
Lined up to be able to make this happen. If thats the case, then we can move forward even if we still have a few loose ends to tie up. As we slip much beyond february 1st, were kind of by default making a decision on the currently approved project. That is the only point. Sounds like you and i have the same objective. I appreciate the assurance to the Community Members and to us that you wouldnt have put it on here for option 4 if you didnt think it was at least, you know, well within the realm of possibility. And, so, two questions. Would it help us, would it help you in your political and other efforts if we were to change the whereas clause that sort of suggests all of the approvals and funding have to be obtained by february 1st to essentially say they all had to be lined up or, you know, presumed to be feasible by february 1st, number one . And number two, would it help you if, as one of our valued constituents said, that we really change the resolution to say were directing you t