Parking meter use fee, also known as the meter bagging fee, to recover the full revenue loss of 21. 30 per bag in fy 2015, and that subsequently the agency index the rate in future fiscal years. Cac urges the mta board to work with the Planning Department to pursue an echo pass similar to that made available by the vta, a group pass for institutions such as residential buildingses, academic institutions, and larger employers ~. Only two more here. Next motion, the cac urges the board to condition work order payments to the sfpd on measured progress on enforcement, transitonly lane restrictions to speed up surface transit. Finally, we have a motion that you may not have seen yet in a letter because got lost for a few days. They have seen it, okay. This concerns the accessible platform on the end judah line at ninth and judah. The sfmta and cac [speaker not understood] funds be used to retrofit the ninth and judah inbound accessible platform on the n judah line so that the historic and v
Which we have in common and to do practical things and so derek is going to mention his recent experience being part of facilitating a gathering for disaster preparation, preparedness. So we will mention that, and my name is chris likeert, i work in the archdiocese of San Francisco in department of communications doing radio production, we have the archbishops radio show every friday on immaculate heart radio and the archbishop shares scripture reflections and we have guests. Our website is sf archdiocese. Org. So pope francis trip to the holy land a powerful event, you may have seen images and or full length liturgies and masses but very powerful in the images alone, you may have seen things from when he was making the spontaneous visit to the wall in bethlehem and all of these other images you may have seen and they are continuing to show up in the news each and every day. He is truly a reconciler and it is a very serious matter, its not something that is a very light hearted matter.
Releasing anyone earlier than when they would be eligible for release. They are only eligible for release when they have done their time so we are letting our Justice System work and we dont believe we should hold anyone beyond that time theyre eligible for release because of a request that came from ice that doesnt have a stamp approval and oversight like it should be and thats where the due process is denialed and when the requests come forward and its approved. Locally we are doing our work. Our department is exemplary in its work up holding the sanctuary city and our whole Justice System is doing its work best it can to make sure that goes forward but its when we have the request from the outside we see the due process denied and we want to create that separation between the local criminal justice enforcement and federal Law Enforcement and thats the basis and why we want this ordinance separate from an amendment with carve outs for people because of offenses. I appreciate that. My
Reoffense and prior conviction there are changes in the rules in the criminal Justice System how you handle those individuals . I would say by and large as spoken by the sheriff that is the case already by policy but i am suggesting there could be an exception to the rule and could be a violent felon or sex offender or weapon possessor and we wouldnt want to keep from being detained. The question is again i agree with that but when we say by law do it through the criminal Justice System instead of injecting immigration and sanctuary. And thats how it is now and if you made the law and those detained wouldnt be detained and could commit a crime in San Francisco. It depends on the specifics and i appreciate the movement by the Sheriffs Office but i dont think we have the right policy. Its actually not the most progressive policy in the country. Santa clara in fact is and santa clara there is santa clara goes beyond what were proposing here, what supervisor avalos is proposing. Santa clar
Place seen as a safe haven for those with prior felony convictions and sex convictions and weapons convictions and its one thing that the people in San Francisco would be contending with the people outside and i dont believe thats in the best interest of Public Safety. I believe anyone in the Justice System is held accountable through actions through the court system and the Sheriffs Department and were just saying that we wouldnt be extending their time because we have a request from the federal government regardless of what their o fence is. I believe supervisor campos has remarks. Thank you chief for being here. I hope you had a good summer. Going back to this issue of Public Safety and im very mindful as the chief Law Enforcement official here in the city that has to be your top priority. Its my top priority too, but i think the whole point of this is making the distinction of the criminal Justice System and this and it would be a mistake on support any system that allows a dangero