D r a question met the circumstances. Also mentioned the r d t further said that the privacy would be impacted at mr. Thorpes property. The project architect is here Michael Levitt is here and the rest of the team is here to answer questions. Commissioners i formerly request that you does not paragraph the project as proposed. Good afternoon mime michael is architect. If i could get the screen up please and thank you. The proposed project is an expansion of a singlefamily home between two centers. This image is the proposed projects. The twostory will be converted. The majority of the expansion will be fill converted to additional living space and it will pop out at the ground level space. Is ground level will bees evaded to downward construction. We propose to actually lower the ceiling healthy and adolescence two feet to offer all of the building current ridge line. The third floor addition in this area is setback 17 feet off the face of the facade. It will remain with a single slope
The d r requester. Project fined you have 5 minutes. Viewpoints wu and commissioner andrew greg on behalf of the project develop or so. Mr. Thorp is now the loan person not in favor of the project. As mentioned earlier staff found neither the project for more the d r a question met the circumstances. Also mentioned the r d t further said that the privacy would be impacted at mr. Thorpes property. The project architect is here Michael Levitt is here and the rest of the team is here to answer questions. Commissioners i formerly request that you does not paragraph the project as proposed. Good afternoon mime michael is architect. If i could get the screen up please and thank you. The proposed project is an expansion of a singlefamily home between two centers. This image is the proposed projects. The twostory will be converted. The majority of the expansion will be fill converted to additional living space and it will pop out at the ground level space. Is ground level will bees evaded to d
The commission would look at again. Commissioner anthony. Im probably okay with the motion. I dont want to be so restrictive. Ive got an area that is owned by homeowners and it would be nice to get some light into the back of there i think more people are concerned about the activity back there and not the light. I dont want to see restriction. As long as there is no passage in there its okay to let a little bit of light into the back of the restaurant. Commissioner moore. I feel i need in addition, not fact that the restaurant does not have any opening in the back youll need some vent levitation. I dont know what exactly to solve the issues here commissioner. I dont know bringing it back seems to effect just the restaurant part. And the upper level gains deck. The larger backyard i guess is what happens. But it seems like a minor you change. If we were to stick with the windows in the backyard were not operational, would that work except wed have to have cleaning people be able to get
Concern. Im generally okay with looithd in the country club would two weeks be sufficient. Yes. You have to give me the date. That would be february 7th accounting. So is the continuance committee more to the february 7th accounting slightly. Commissioner borden. My question is when you come back on that date talk about the mechanic equipment that i are going to use please have that. Does the project commission have i dont know here talking about 11 feet i suggested by keeping the light and is the mechanical equipment a problem. Is the primary issue the noise . So one of the issues is to keep the plan as is and keep the mechanical except. And option two is to pull the restaurant back 11 feet and notes have a right leaving the possibility of no Natural Light maybe having a sky light. To it seems to me that the commissioners primary issue is the looikt in the back commissioner moore. No, im sorry im done. This reminds me of a case we had 6 years ago. There was a rear patio in the middle
Welcome to hardtalk with me. As the covid 19 pandemic takes hold, the capacity of governments around the world to respond is being seriously tested. My guess is the secretary general of the United States two nations, antonio guterres, hasjust launched a humanitarian appeal focused mainly on helping a0 of the most vulnerable countries. He says that a global approach is the only way to fight the virus and without critical support, the impact of covid 19 it will be deep and particularly severe on poorer nations. But how realistic are his proposals and who will pay for them . Secretary general, antonio guterres, welcome to hardtalk. You have described covid 19 as a threat to all humanity, what you mean by that and how worried are you . First of all, it is a pleasure to be with you again. It is clear, i mean, if this pandemic would be left alone, if you wouldnt be able to suppress it, it wouldnt be able to suppress it, it would reach millions of millions of people and have millions of milli