The countrys borders as a way to protect u. S. Citizens privacy. So Higher Standards have accompanied the collection of information on citizens on domestic soil under the foreign Intelligence Surveillance act. The problem is that our communications no longer stay window midwest i can bounds. So in 2008 the government made a strong argument that it didnt make sense any more that if communications outside the United States, if you had a bad guy in london calling a bad guy in paris, traditionally under fisa you dont need to go to the court to get a warrant but now if those same two actors use email and it happens to go through the United States, the government has to go to a court to intercept those communications. A very strong argument for 2008 fisa amendments act. The problem is it works two ways. Now if im sitting in this room and i email jen and it goes internationally, now it can be collected. So data is not territorial and not bound by countries borders in the way traditionally wev
A mastermind. So all of these kids are sitting home, even in new york, in california, and massachusetts, all of the mastermind, he is not a mastermind. He he is a lowlife. He is just a lowlife guy. He is a bomb. He is a bomb. Bomb i bet he doesnt have a 90 iq. They have to stop limeys people masterminds. We have to take back the internet, there are so many things we have to do. We have a president that doesnt have a clue, we have a president we have a president that says isis is contained. Its contained. The only thing contained is us. We are contained are contained because we have no leadership. We have to take back the internet is ours, but they have taking over the internet. They are using the internet better than we are. Theyre using the internet and they are recruiting people. Then people go out to fight for isis and then we let them back into the country. We let them back inches where have you been . Ive been fighting for isis, o come back o come back in, go back home to texas. H
Good evening ladies and gentlemen. Colonist and editorial cartoonist is an awardwinning graphic novelist and the author of nonfiction books about domestic and International Current affairs. His cartoons appear at approximately 100 newspapers around the United States and from 2008 to 2009 he was president of the association of the editorial cartoonist and hes won several awards for his work including the journalism awards and the National Journalism award and best book of the year award. Joining him on stage tonight is chris hedges who spent barely two decades as a correspondent in Central America the middle east, africa and the balkans. Hes reported for more than 50 countries and has worked for the Christian Science monitor and the National Public radio at the Dallas Morning News and New York Times. He was part of the team of reporters at the times and awarded a Pulitzer Prize for coverage about global terrorism. Hes also the author of several bestselling books including ward gives us
Protecting privacy of american citizens while doing cybersecurity and promoting information sharing. Host so how has the focus changed over the last couple years when it comes to cybersecurity and protecting against cyber attack . Guest well, especially after a lot of the incidents that weve seen, for example be, the sony incident and the incident against opm in the federal government, theres been a a lot of focus on making sure that we have areas protected and parts of the economy protects that arent necessarily in the critical infrastructure, arent necessarily the major federal agencies, making sure that we have a lot more coverage, more broad coverage across a wide range of different entities. Everyone is at risk of having a cyber incident, and how do you go about making sure that you have the resources that those institutions need that traditionally have not gotten the direct funds or the direct information that they need in order to protect themselves. Host in your personal view,
Individual subscriber by going to a court and obtaining a court order and allowing the subscriber to raise whatever objections they have before the court. Its interesting that some of the testimony thats been given here and i think its very concerning from some issues of anecdotal evidence and real evidence and discussions especially on the s. E. C. Side when youre, you know, giving the your own report saying youre doing more than youve ever done here yet without this by choice or by decision however you want to do it. Mr. Calabrese, one last question for you because my time is now over. But in dissent from the ftc request the civil agency carveout they wrote im not convinced this authority is necessary to maintain the commissions effectiveness as a law enforce the agency now or in cases we can foresee. I am concerned that the civil authorities to obtain content from ecpa providers can have the potential to lead to invasions of individual privacy and in some circumstances may be uncons