Preservation project reviews, which is embedded in part of current planning when a preservation planner is asked to attend a project review meeting. Special projects and to give you a sense of what this includes where you see there is a slight decrease, i will have to double check this number. The one thing i did want to mention was special pronltzes does include grants. We do currently have a c. L. G. Grant for the chineseamerican experience, Historic Context statement. We are currently under contract. We do intend on applying for another c. L. G. Grant next year. Our civil rights underrepresented Community Grant is winding down so that is not reflected here, which is one of the reasons for the decrease. The one thing that may not be reflected here, as youre aware, the National Trust will have its conference heres in november. We are working with the trust and discussing with San Francisco heritage to be a partner in that in that dofrns really help guide the intangible heritage tracks
Amount of and the Western Addition that are still dedicated to the preservation of sacred heart. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you for coming can. Maybe we should ask the public about what we should have done. [laughter] whats convenient this actually has been continued before . Yes. I think we continued it maybe twice before, is that twice. Twice, yes. From july 19 and then again from october 18. So, this will be the third continuance. I would suggest march 21. Do i have a motion . Yes. And does it come back to us a second time . For landmarking, it comes to us twice, right . So we would initiate it and then it could come back again. Nothing in the designation report or the application will change. This is the recommendation. That you initiated earlier on this item last year. So this would be the recommendation. Oh, all right. This is the second final. Yeah. Ok. Thank you for that clarification. All right. I move the item be continued to march 231. March 21. Thank you. Second. Thank you
Your commission and pg e, we have a lot of common interests. Park and rec need to dredge the site to keep it operating as a marina. We have an interest in that theres historical facts from gas plants that operated about a hundred years ago that are underneath the harbor. Weve been trying to figure out a way forward. We have designs for a large dredge project out there. The more our team looked at this, the more i think people just said this does not feel like the right answer. Its a heavyhanded approach. It has a lot of impacts of the actual construction. Some kind of questionable environmental benefits and importantly, very high costs. Were talking tens of millions of dollars here. Our team went back to the drawing boards and said whats the best thing to do for the environment and can we look at this through a different lens . Can we come up with something that might be for attractive to the citizens and to the parties involved . What we came up with, i handed out earlier a onepage sh
The one thing that may not be reflected here, as youre aware, the National Trust will have its conference heres in november. We are working with the trust and discussing with San Francisco heritage to be a partner in that in that dofrns really help guide the intangible heritage tracks and the Community Involvement in the overall conference. There may be some financial commitment that the city is willing to provide to make sure that happens. So well make sure these numbers are adjusted to reflect that. If they are different. It wont be a huge change, though, from what you see here. And then finally, the legacy Business Programme and Cultural Heritage initiatives, which as you recall from last year, creating that position, now we have a full f. T. Devoted to that. Quick question for you. About the pick. Is that reflected in this or is that you said that the pick is being increased from the parttime position to a fulltime position, is that correct . That occurred last year. Michelle langl