As president , but warning against taking them out on an arbitrary time line next year. The president announcing today that he would keep nearly 10,000 troops in the region until october 2016 and then cut back to 5,500 in early 2017. In a statement the majority leader said the decision to reduce troop numbers should be left to the next president. You can read more here at the washington examiner. Weve heard from the chair of the Armed Services committee, who released a statement saying given the troubling conditions on the ground in afghanistan and the other Security Problems in the region keeping 9,800 troops through at least 2016 is necessary for our security interests. You can also hear the president s announcement for yourself in its entirety and well have it at 8 00 p. M. Eastern time over on cspan. Known as the city of good neighborhoods, this weekend our cspan cities tour joined by Time Warner Cable explores the history and literary life of buffalo wrarks new york, on become tv
Is mandated. I think 13 its on the table. And a couple have vetoed it. What states individually do is up to them but certainly along those lines we recognize thats valuable. And are you saying that its a federal regulation . Im not familiar with the process. Im just learning. Okay. Because the extent that those are out there, what were doing is were trying to pick up the slack for a lot of failed federal agencies that havent paid attention to that. I think its extremely valuable to have so we want to make sure theres more access to providers who are minority members and being part of communities and being out there. As we have made major changes from our first draft of this bill 3717 to the current one 2646, and were working on other things there, too. We recognize thats a valuable part of a necessary change that people do have that crosscultural sensitivity to help. We want to do that. If you have other wording on language to help us with that, were glad to look at that. Thank you. Th
Your bill is highly threatening to people who have psychiatric diagnosis. That there are more controls being put in place and more Civil Liberties who did you hear that from . Several people. Who . What organization. On our own. So what happens is organizations who get funding from sampson. Sampson didnt say anything. They do. They fund a lot of these organizations. They make sure you speak out because you take away the funding. Were not taking away funding. We are protecting peoples rights to be well. Let me finish. Okay. People have the right to get better. There is nothing in our bill that takes away rights. One organization told the audience says if a Police Officer stops you for traffic activity they can force you to take medication. That is not true. They are creating a whole cloud of lies. We want more providers. We want more places for treatment. We want grants. We want innovation grants, demonstration grants. We dont money to be bought up in washington. We want more efficiency
Ruling while revealing a life in the times of the people in these cases. Cases. Klandmark join the conversation as we take your comments during the program. For background on each case while you watch, order your copy of the companion book, and available at cspan. Org landma rkcases. Next, a form on improving Mental Health treatment in the united dates. The House Budget Committee meets to consider different versions of the federal budget. A with garyq hart. Announcer tim murphy and christmas we talked about Mental Health bills. A panel weighed in on ways the nation can assist those with Mental Illness. This is two hours. Johanna we encourage your engagement during the program via social media. Audience question and there are microphones around the room. Please state your name and organization. You can also submit your question anytime during this program the a twitter. Via twitter. We encourage you to download our mobile app. Andncludes the Schedule Information about todays speakers, a
Oh denial, unemployment, free trade, congressional dysfunction, all of these things seem to overlap. The New York Times cover this recently in july bipartisan pushed to builds to relax laws. Host do you have a thought on giving judges more discussion . Retion . Guest i do see this really strong bipartisan support in this area, this region, that we reside in, we have interest from democrats, republicans, people who want to see a change in how the system works, and the successes we are having. I see really strong support for outcomes, and not necessarily affiliations. I think that discussion provided to the judges is really an important piece of this change. , an joe in South Carolina independent with experience in the Corrections System. What is your question or comment . Caller first of all, i want to tell you how i appreciate your show, and you. Can you hear me . Host we can. Were listening. Thank you for that. Caller i was in a correctional facility back in 1980, right around there.