Skbl. Supervisor ronen could you describe again the decision like, where the two potholes were dug, why you chose those two . One was giving us the end of the street, the upper end of the street, and the other one was giving us kind of a low point on where the road was lumping up, so we figured that the pipeline is fairly straight, and that those two points face on what pg es instruction would give us, the pipeline. And the pipeline was surveyed by an additional surveyor, and a response was done. Supervisor ronen okay. Okay. And who prepared the initial response and evacuation plan . We worked with the Fire Department to prepare that. We tried many, many times to get in contact with the San Francisco department of emergency. I was sent hundreds of emails, i called and left messages. I went there personally many times, never got a call return. I would have liked to have gotten their input, but i wasnt able to. Pg e indicated they had a very robust evacuation plan thats being developed w
Question is can you explain whether or not the road that will be built, extending folsom to the properties in the evacuation plan, given the steep flow . For example, has it been determined if compaction will need to be determined for the steep slope or the new roadway . Yes, all of that is being determined. It is only when we start the new projects, those will have to be dug and compacted, but we allow plenty of distance between pipeline 109 and the sewer line thats the closest, so i think its about fine feet away, and the gas pipeline is another 6 foot away from the sewer line. Only the laterals from the houses will go over the pipeline 109, and we based on the elevation points we have, we were able to verify that there is enough distance to meet all the requirements, and the sections were reviewed by d. P. W. And pg e, and i think by all the departments in the process of street improvements that were still going through. Supervisor ronen and were the materials and equipment ne neede
Is mandated. I think 13 its on the table. And a couple have vetoed it. What states individually do is up to them but certainly along those lines we recognize thats valuable. And are you saying that its a federal regulation . Im not familiar with the process. Im just learning. Okay. Because the extent that those are out there, what were doing is were trying to pick up the slack for a lot of failed federal agencies that havent paid attention to that. I think its extremely valuable to have so we want to make sure theres more access to providers who are minority members and being part of communities and being out there. As we have made major changes from our first draft of this bill 3717 to the current one 2646, and were working on other things there, too. We recognize thats a valuable part of a necessary change that people do have that crosscultural sensitivity to help. We want to do that. If you have other wording on language to help us with that, were glad to look at that. Thank you. Th