Tool by which the city has worked on bringing its fleet of vehicles. In 2010 there were some significant amendments to it and it took on its current name of hacto. Primarily some of the bigger changes was it did add a component about transit first and also the whole concept of fleet reduction. Ill mention a bit more about that in a minute. One important thing to realize about hacto is that the way it was established is enacted by the board of supervisors. It applies to light duty vehicles within the fleet. So, its not the entire fleet of vehicles that the city owns, does not include heavy duty vehicles. It is vehicles up to 8500 pounds, gross vehicle weight. So, that means basically passenger vehicle, primarily passenger vehicleses and light duty trucks. And nor does it include because effectively waived by one means or another Public Safety and emergency vehicles. So, the main components, then, of the ordinance as its was adopted by the board of supervisors and as it has been placed w
Survey efforts, were seeing that 15 of City Employees report that they actually do use the bikes. So, a lot of departments are getting the bikes and theyre starting to get a good deal of use. 64 of the departments have moved to having some sort of pooled vehicle so individuals arent assigned individual vehicles, and that is a way of obviously reducing the amount of vehicles in the fleet and unnecessary travel. Promotion of teleconferencing and providing equipment for Video Conferencing is another way of, again, encouraging, promoting, pushing people towards not traveling for work purposes, planning some other means of doing it. So, those are the reports of where we are with the transit first strategies as of the last fiscal year. On fleet reduction, again, the ordinance requires that each individual department have a strategy for reducing their fleet by 20 over a power year period or 5 a year. ~ fouryear period the reduction of measuring that percent of reduction is based on what the b
I am speechless. You know, Public Service is a privilege and its especially so if you get to do it in your hometown so i feel fortunate in that regard. Im honored to be able to serve you and the people of San Francisco and really appreciate all the support and policy guidance youve given me and my colleagues at the sfmta through all these years and thank you very much for the opportunity. Thank you. We look forward to seeing you on muni. [applause] i have a second commendation for another Public Servant who will be departing with us very shortly who has helped to head up for almost four years, department of the environment. Id like to invite up melanie nutter. She has an incredibly long list of accomplishments during her time and ill just highlight a couple of her accomplishments. She helped to successfully implement or mandatory composting recycling policy to move our city to a city of zero waste. She helped advance us to be the electric vehicle capital. Shes someone who helped to enc
Yes, thank you. All right, thank you very much. Comments from colleagues . Commissioner wald. Unless commissioner josefowitz wants to go first. Thank you. I was overly enthusiastic. Shes getting a little better than last year. Its been a learning process for everybody. All of the fleet everybody involved with the fleets this has been a learning process, to try and figure out how to get similar types of data and how to make it work. Great. I think, you know, we still below a lot of our targets, i guess. But i mean, its great improvement from where it was before. So, congratulations and keep up the good work. Thank you. Hope to continue moving it in that direction. Thanks, commissioner. I just have one question. When it comes to fleet reduction and green vehicle purchasing, im wondering if theres any departments that kind of rise to the top as shining stars and maybe some that are still kind of getting there. And dont worry, its not like this is a public meeting. Its not recorded. Nobody
Efficiency in the city as soon as the application process goes forward. That is something you should be talking to the sfpuc about. It is my understanding through City Attorneys discussions it would be the sfpuc that would have to apply for that monday soy part of your discussions is why they not applying for this money as an asterisk or side note to that, my personal guess might be the cpuc might say no to this application because were not serving customers yet and do not have a plan to serve customers but it doesnt hurt to ask as a cca program can we have access to that money. I believe between the sfpuc staff and your staff at the department of the environment you could probably put together a very good program that could utilize that money and start working on that 15 of the goal thats going forward. I would also add in on the discussion of bart to achieve 100 [speaker not understood] the joint hearing from them they are having the power enterprise in the very near future is going