this is nothing against meg munn, by the way. so, the point here is the archbishops council make a decision for the independent body to appoint a chair who, within 48 hours, 7a victims and survivors contact us to say, do not, under any circumstances, share data with this person because she s part of the church. she sits on the national safeguarding steering group, which we scrutinise, so we ve got a problem. well, i need to say, because the legal issues here are complex but they re quite important, that the first chair of your board, maggie atkinson, absolutely rejects the characterisation you ve just given as to why she left and she s described your views of why she left as partial, biased and deeply prejudiced against her, so we need to put that on the record. 0k. surely, what really matters here is you, for good or ill, have now left the board, the board has been dissolved,
you were told by officials that you were too survivor focused. they say that is a complete misrepresentation of what you were told. they also say that you and steve reeves behaved in a way which made the functioning of the board pretty much impossible. and to add to that, meg munn, who was the interim chairman appointed to this board of three, she says, of you and steve reeves although they initially welcomed my appointment, the two existing board members that is, you and reeves routinely ignored emails, failed to respond to reasonable requests, declined to have meetings. i was staggered at this unprofessional behaviour, particularly when it concerned such important issues. 0k. so, the first thing to say is that we re an independent body. after the first chair resigned because of serious data
breaches, she resigned the second chair should have been somebody appointed in the same way we were appointed, openly recruited, and she wasn t. she was imposed upon us. this is nothing against meg munn, by the way. so, the point here is the archbishops council make a decision for the independent body to appoint a chair who, within 48 hours, 7a victims and survivors contact us to say, do not under any circumstances share data with this person because she s part of the church. she sits on the national safeguarding steering group, which we scrutinise, so we ve got a problem. well, i need to say, because the legal issues here are complex but they re quite important, that the first chair of your board, maggie atkinson, absolutely rejects the characterisation you ve just given as to why she left and she s described your views of why she left as partial, biased and deeply prejudiced against her, so we need to put
this is nothing against meg munn, by the way. so, the point here is the archbishops council make a decision for the independent body to appoint a chair who, within 48 hours, 7a victims and survivors contact us to say, do not, under any circumstances, share data with this person because she s part of the church. she sits on the national safeguarding steering group, which we scrutinise, so we ve got a problem. well, i need to say, because the legal issues here are complex but they re quite important, that the first chair of your board, maggie atkinson, absolutely rejects the characterisation you ve just given as to why she left and she s described your views of why she left as partial, biased and deeply prejudiced against her, so we need to put that on the record. 0k. surely, what really matters here is you, for good or ill, have now left the board, the board has been dissolved,
steve reeves behaved in a way which made the functioning of the board pretty much impossible. and to add to that, meg munn, who was the interim chairman appointed to this board of three, she says of you and steve reeves although they initially welcomed my appointment, the two existing board members that is, you and reeves routinely ignored emails, failed to respond to reasonable requests, declined to have meetings. i was staggered at this unprofessional behaviour, particularly when it concerned such important issues. 0k. so, the first thing to say is that we re an independent body. after the first chair resigned because of serious data breaches, she resigned the second chair should have been somebody appointed in the same way we were appointed, openly recruited, and she wasn t. she was imposed upon us.