she sits on the national safeguarding steering group, which we scrutinise, so we ve got a problem. well, i need to say, because the legal issues here are complex but they re quite important, that the first chair of your board, maggie atkinson, absolutely rejects the characterisation you ve just given as to why she left and she s described your views of why she left as partial, biased and deeply prejudiced against her, so we need to put that on the record. 0k. surely, what really matters here is you, for good or ill, have now left the board, the board has been dissolved, and the real impact here is on survivors of alleged abuse inside the church of england. i believe there were at least a dozen active cases that you were working on when the board was dissolved. yeah. what are you saying to you re still in touch with them, i imagine.
been somebody appointed in the same way we were appointed, openly recruited, and she wasn t. she was imposed upon us. this is nothing against meg munn, by the way. so, the point here is the archbishops council make a decision for the independent body to appoint a chair who, within 48 hours, 7a victims and survivors contact us to say, do not, under any circumstances, share data with this person because she s part of the church. she sits on the national safeguarding steering group, which we scrutinise, so we ve got a problem. well, i need to say, because the legal issues here are complex but they re quite important, that the first chair of your board, maggie atkinson, absolutely rejects the characterisation you ve just given as to why she left and she s described your views of why she left as partial, biased and deeply prejudiced against her, so we need to put that on the record. 0k.
0k. so, the first thing to say is that we re an independent body. after the first chair resigned because of serious data breaches, she resigned the second chair should have been somebody appointed in the same way we were appointed, openly recruited, and she wasn t. she was imposed upon us. this is nothing against meg munn, by the way. so, the point here is the archbishops council make a decision for the independent body to appoint a chair who, within 48 hours, 7a victims and survivors contact us to say, do not, under any circumstances, share data with this person because she s part of the church. she sits on the national safeguarding steering group, which we scrutinise, so we ve got a problem. well, i need to say, because the legal issues here are complex but they re
this is nothing against meg munn, by the way. so, the point here is the archbishops council make a decision for the independent body to appoint a chair who, within 48 hours, 7a victims and survivors contact us to say, do not, under any circumstances, share data with this person because she s part of the church. she sits on the national safeguarding steering group, which we scrutinise, so we ve got a problem. well, i need to say, because the legal issues here are complex but they re quite important, that the first chair of your board, maggie atkinson, absolutely rejects the characterisation you ve just given as to why she left and she s described your views of why she left as partial, biased and deeply prejudiced against her, so we need to put that on the record. 0k. surely, what really matters here is you, for good or ill, have now left the board, the board has been dissolved,
breaches, she resigned the second chair should have been somebody appointed in the same way we were appointed, openly recruited, and she wasn t. she was imposed upon us. this is nothing against meg munn, by the way. so, the point here is the archbishops council make a decision for the independent body to appoint a chair who, within 48 hours, 7a victims and survivors contact us to say, do not under any circumstances share data with this person because she s part of the church. she sits on the national safeguarding steering group, which we scrutinise, so we ve got a problem. well, i need to say, because the legal issues here are complex but they re quite important, that the first chair of your board, maggie atkinson, absolutely rejects the characterisation you ve just given as to why she left and she s described your views of why she left as partial, biased and deeply prejudiced against her, so we need to put