understand for those 40 years that the hyde amendment disproportionately affected poor women and women of color? that is not my position. tough questions today from the mainstream media on the democratic presidential candidate s flop on federal funding for abortion. he is now for it. is the media turning against the former vice president in favor of the more progressive generation? brent buzzell on the new book unmasked. thank you for having me. shannon: it is interesting several of the pieces written today talked about this is a good thing, it proves progressives bring about important change. whether it was genuine are not affected change where the rest of the field is mission accomplished. i would say they are not
on the business competitive front, pete, we could agree at some point. we really could. heat heat warren, hegseth. pete: sometimes they have good ideas and you have to acknowledge that i surprised myself. you and guy out to dinner and hang out. this is life. come up with great ideas. hey, why don t we start this app. or hey, why don t we try. this the landscape has now become very difficult for us to do that because we can t just do it out of our garage anymore. we have to. ed: appreciate you coming. in it s going to be squashed by the big guy. pete: big time. pete: the left never shies away from criticizing mike pence, our vice president s christian faith. this time the media turning against trump and the sphwhible turning it into a joke. why? why in the back and forth coming up next. ed: anthony scwarm, dan
conference? no reason unless you re about to announce your candidacy. i think that s a fair assumption. with respect to the notion of media turning on her, what s on the cover of new york times or today talking about vague rumors of e-mail or hillarynomics, the suggestion that jeb bush, marco rubio and scott walker also used personal e-mail for official business. the media s turning back pretty quick and turning to issues like iran nuclear deal and isis and economic inequality. this e-mail stuff we had another democrat strategist tell us it s time to move on also. sabrina, this scandal has a lot of legs. every day we wake up and there s something else. today we heard hillary clinton s blackberry wasn t issued by the state department or dotgov, it
otherwise why do the big press conference? no reason unless you re about to announce your candidacy. i think that s a fair assumption. with respect to the notion of media turning on her, what s on the cover of new york times or today talking about vague rumors of e-mail or hillarynomics, the suggestion that jeb bush, marco rubio and scott walker also used personal e-mail for official business. the media s turning back pretty quick and turning to issues like iran nuclear deal and isis and economic inequality. this e-mail stuff we had another democrat strategist tell us it s time to move on also. sabrina, this scandal has a lot of legs. every day we wake up and there s something else. today we heard hillary clinton s blackberry wasn t issued by the state department or dotgov, it
knowing about watergate and abu ghraib and iraq, this should matter to a lot of people. the media has pretty scathingly indicted eric holder in the past few weeks. in addition to the complaints about this off the record meeting, national journal, for example, has a headline out. seven reasons why the media should not keep eric holder s secrets. do you see the media turning on holder and the administration over this? if so, to what effect? the attorney suggests they had a position in favor of them at some point. what i do think is that i ve been aware, and i m not a working report he there on a daily basis. i m in touch with the work in washington press corps. for some time they ve been very frustrated about their ability to extract information that they think legitimately belongs in the public venue. what a lot of people don t understand is what happens in cases like this very often. you develop information. the administration finds out that you ve got it.