they made fun of his call for censorship. not because it is unconstitutional, but it wasn t quite fascist enough. one of those weird looking media reporters at cnn wrote this. i m sure the murdoches will get right on this, now that this special appeal has been made. they understand what s going on here. joe biden is targeting fox news for censorship. his call for censorship comes after hundreds of doctors and scientists called on spotify to adopt a misinformation policy that would shut down joe rogan s podcast. it s not just the government, of course. it s people acting on behalf of the government calling for the same thing, which isn censorship of political opinion. enwhat you are seeing here is dangerous. there s no other way to describe it. far more danger than domestic terrorist threats.no under the first amendment, the government cannot coordinate the private act or censure free
wondering what happens now. we know that kylar has appointed three steady reliable hands, three long time members of zucker s leadership team to run cnn until discovery takes over. michael bass, amy and ken. they know what to do and they re doing it every day. keeping cnn humming along. when this deal closes, probably april or may, discovery will name a new boss, a new head of cnn. i m told by sources that discovery views this as a fresh start for cnn. and maybe in a year people will look back and say this was a good thing for cnn, new leadership, but it s not what the staffers here wanted and certainly not like this. now, that s my report from the inside and, let s face it, i work here. so i decided to bring in three outsiders, three media reporters and analysts who are looking at this from outside cnn so they can bring their perspectives and you can hear independent views of this situation. let s bring them in now. claire atkinson for insider,
judge and jury from the beginning. yeah. and let s bring it back now to what happened yesterday as far as msnbc being banned. you can make the argument, pete, and it s a good one, that msnbc is attempting to obstruct justice here. right? because if the jury is aware that they re being followed, that s intimidation. that s harassment. and this isn t antifa. it s allegedly a national news organization which, for weeks, has been saying that sort of stuff that we just played. and these actions can sway the way they vote in this trial as far as following the jury. and, look, these orders usually don t happen on a low level by the way. i will leave it here. i can waste everyone s time and list the reasons for internal investigation carried out by third party? why bother? msnbc is going to wait this out. they know most media reporters and those covering the industry. tacitly disagree with the. whole bowl of wrong, pete. pete: a bowl of wrong.
our country. the best unintentional comedy, jim acosta, to cover republicans, that is happening for some time especially on his program, media matters with a microphone and if fox news didn t exist as soon as you were born this program wouldn t exist in many media reporters would have nothing to talk about because that is their focus. there isn t one objective observer of media would advocate covering one political party different but this is cnn s m oh when he took orders from the white house and didn t ask one question about afghanistan of president biden at townhall the only friends and relatives watched and the reliable sources host likely approves of cnn having 7 democrats ask questions of president biden during the townhall but only two republicans in the audience