Question of the legal team and the defense side hoping this would be gone long ago. And it isnt. And the Office Of Special Counsel expected monday or tuesday with their latest request or conditions that theyd like to see for a potential interview with the president. One of the things theyre saying is he could be asked about matters that happened prior to taking office that would kind of cover the area of collusion, alleged collusion. Was there any interference from russian operatives with actual individuals in the trump orbit . Weve seen some of that playing out in recent months. But not things that took place while the president was in office, which would cover all of the things that relate to the comey firing or alleged Obstruction Of Justice. Thats where they stand at the moment. Will any of this amount to an interview with the president. Many legal experts say that would be perilous for the president to voluntarily do it. At the same time, we dont know if the Special Counsel will a
you nurture we listen, you teach we thrive. you lift our spirits, but we ve gotta lay down the truth. it s time for you, our shero to stretch for the stars. a free online chat can give you the personalized tips you need to start boosting your retirement savings today. start saving more for retirement, so you can feel prepared and live your life to the fullest. visit aceyourretirement.org howard: a federal judge has ruled the biden administration must limit most contacts with social media giants in a suit filed by republican a.g. in louisiana and missouri. a decision some media folks are calling an attack on free speech, the trump-appointed judge ruled that biden officials went too far in lobbying to remove posts dealing with vaccines and interference in american elections. there are some allegations of some very heavy-handed tactics here where the government was
had other gun crimes and drug crimes in his past and, there are therefore, he got a hard harsher sentence. hunter s were not charged perhaps because there s a with to-tiered system in which he s treat differently. howard: i think if the president is town even indirectly to help his son, it s going to blow up and be huge but, again, i haven t seen the evidence. in fact, one of the irs whistleblowers say that the u.s. attorney david weiss a had asked for a different title and didn t yet it from doj, prompting a rare response from attorney general merrick garland. take a look. i don t know how it would be possible for anybody to block him from bringing a prosecution given that he has this authority. howard: kevin, look, some media folks express sympathy for hunter biden because he has been a crack addict. joe biden has conducted interventions with him. but hunter is a grown man in his 50s, and convicted criminal,
ñractually, the mueller gran jury and my voluntary interview theyñi specifically asked if i ever had dealt with the national enquirer which i said i had not, if you considered sortfá of media folks, let sw3 you know, each person in the office handles certain ones, that was michael and michael dealt witik themñi for many, ma years. i had told them that i had heard or i had to wait outside when david pecker wasçó meeting with then mr. trump and michael cohen in his office. i had seen david in the office throughout, you know, 2013, 2014. that was something that they brought back up into the grand g÷)u)y. i, you know, it( personally considered it exculpatory because i figured they were investigating the publicq recording that had come out about stormy daniels, the settlement. another issue that they were wondering about wasxd whether -
into exactly how the documents got there. how long have they been there? all that type of information, arthel. arthel: but doug, meanwhile s president biden taken the right approach? or is he inadvertently hurting his own case with this slow drip of discovery? could this cause distrust? is a great question. let makes a public relations media. the point is in the questioning from peter doocy the other day, when he made that sort of dramatic statement, which was smart to put the president under a little pressure, what were you thinking? again, right there he should not have made any statements. that is from a criminal law standpoint. public relations wise, while i m not an expert i would say they do seem to be having a little trouble sort of controlling what is going on. getting out in front of the story as a media folks like to describe it. so to answer questions specifically think they ve made