most part who would only get hurt if you said something and his brow would furrow and you d think you hurt his feelings. but he didn t have any of these wasn t even close to what he became on fox. did you recognize this person reading the new york times they talkabout the so-called nativism, which is a fancy word for the racism quote, he prospered with trump s presidency what made frank nativism and seething the touch stones pushing the racist, anti-semitic race theory. that s different from the tucker you knew so different. he was a cheerful libertarian. the worst thing he ever did was bark at a guest from peta. pun intended. oh, yes but not appreciated by the
sed sed sedition here to discuss. welcome to town. happen to be here quite a week for media and politics when you look at this as a reckoning for mr. carlson, what do you think it sends as a message to his leftover colleagues at fox? to the colleagues left it s a sign you can be let go at any time no matter how high you ve risen and your ratings bill o reilly was let go when it was too hot to keep him. megyn kelly. and they disappeared more or less but there s always another star in waiting at fox it seems to me tucker, i had a show with him on cnn. it was early 2000. maybe 01, 02. daily you guys were together. yeah. yeah. he was a merry prankster. he was a cheerful guy for the
juanita tolliver on more than one aspect jerry. we gave fox the chance to respond, gave ted cruz the chance he would get the time you got. but jerry, thank you for joining us up ahead tonight jerry mentioned peter navarro. we have news on him as he awaits trial. and we go deep into the tucker part of this we spent time on the new tapes tapes we just learn odden this program, the special counsel investigating the january 6th coup is pursuing we get into the tucker carlson of it all that s next.
kyle rittenhouse is saving is getting sued for. it s almost unbelievable a man who tried to kill you and was prevented from killing you by your act of self-defense is suing you because he wasn t abl to sue you kill you, how is tha make sense? thank you for having me tucker. i have no idea. it s ridiculous also it s very frustrating and upsetting. to me, this is an attack on our second amendment rights and our right to self-defense. it is saying if you use your god-given right to self-defense they re going to come after you. if you win in court can hear acquitted, rightfully so they r going to take you to civil courts and they re going to tak you for everything your worth, take you into bankruptcy. that is what is happening. we re watching this happen all over the country. civil suits used to shut down free speech, it is destroying
problem. it s unclear if siebel newsom s f her films have films have fixed society s issues, but they certainly appear to have broke apparenn sl policies because the movies reportedly contain images of women in compromising positions, along with a litany of profanities. one sacramento area school superintendent said the filmsent should not have been shown a st his classrooms because they are inappropriate for elementary and middle schoolers and it s se notable that siebel newsom does filmdisclose which groups and organizations buy and license horror films, which couls thatd pose ethical issuesa if, for example, her husbanda tn was to seek higher office. if there is such a thing, tucker, if there is such a thing, great trace gallagher. you can watch trace every night at midnight on fox news and we suggest you do so never in the history of jobs has anybody had a more misleadingd , job title than alejandro. mayorkas. ho is the homeland security