so actually this morning is misleading into making the plaintiff or anyone else thinking it is not that spicy new.and the other thing is particularly egregious at least from the case as far as i ve seen it is the fact that she warned the waiters that she asked them to make it less sp spicy, and then she comes out with these injuries. i mean, you talk about ghost pepper style spiciness if you r talking about a level that hot, this is from the mercury news pulling the restaurant supervisor. supervisor at the restaurant said the restaurant had never previously had a patron say the had been burned by a dish and needed an equal attention. kevin bahl dragon ball, said supervisor prior, are spicy, bu we do not use too much chili spice in dragon balls. however, is not possible for th appetizer to be made in a mild version, as chili s inside the balls. that is according to prior. so, listen, you can look at thi a couple ways, obviously, ro
alternative plaintiffs drink an entire glass of coconut water and more water. but the burning did not subside as a direct and partial results of eating this food place to begin to lose your voice. she was later diagnosed with a medical burn to both vocal co cords, a chemical burn to the middle country of the right nostril, and a chemical burn to the esophagus. meanwhile, robert, i don t mind telling you, if it was that spicy, maybe you should be in the courtroom somewhere looking for justice he s absolutely younger and people have to remember that the word local points of, you take the plaintiff as you find them, the will be, quote-unquote, eggshell plaintiff, somebody who just generally is not as robust in the community. but you have to prepare for tha is a business owner go these woman, these are not trivial injuries but when we think of the, quote-unquote, mcdonald s coffee case, keep in mind that woman suffered
listen to what mike pompeo had to say about that: belief that just got to the heart of it wit a simple question: have you ever done anything like this before? is this unique? can you sign the president for what you have just done? of course, the prosecutor candidly under oath, in front, of course, had to admit, no, never done anything like this before. i think every american, frankli are just red america, could see that that is unjust, it is unequal that these parties weren t actually negotiating a plea but were actually working to undermine our justice system. about 15-20 seconds each, guys. i am thinking special counsel, professor you processing secretary pompeo said everythin will now just said, everything we heard the man s a special counsel in this case. the government is in a conflict of interest because it cannot, into government led by presiden biden without conflict to investigate the son of the sitting president. will, do you agree? yeah absolutely. i would just add tha
we bring in fox news medical contributor physician and docto at johns-hopkins university. i want to be incredibly del delicate. this is a very serious situ situation, and i think it is impolite to make light of what going on. but i also think it bears askin the question, what point should be awfully concerned? we are talking about in some cases octogenarians and in some cases people 90 years old. these things will happen. this is not terribly uncommon, i m imagining. we just happen to be watching i all unfold in front of live tv cameras presents right wrong in the case of dianne feinstein it might be age related dementia. some people get slow, some are not as sharp. some people actually confuse themselves a lot at that stage of dementia. with mitch mcconnell he fell. and when you fall you are going to have some consequences. he probably had a bad conc concussion, and maybe dealing with similar consequences of that. some people say diversity
third-degree burns all over his can because of those coffee burns. so situations like this we have seen juries returned british in favor of the plaintiff. in this case, she has a strong case for that, particularly if she is able to reserve a portio of the food in question that could be tested and truly is negligence on the part of the sheriff or preparer, or the establishment peace out to show you, jonathan, if i can get you to weigh in. i am going to skip ahead and show them what the menu looks like. i think this will help the people at home too, because there s a little symbol right there. and you see it looks like it says, you know, gluten-free but there is a little pepper down there. that tells you that it s hot. doesn t the customer, john, hav the responsibility not to eat something hot if they don t lik hot food? in some respects, yes, there is this morning. but what makes this somewhat egregious is the spiciness of this food was something like 2 25 to 50 times spicier than a j