right, they re going down the line of instructions, they will get to self-defense. they will either find the shooting to be justifiable or they will not find it to be justifiable. the only wrinkle in that is that o mara told them, why don t you start with self-defense and that may shortcut the whole process. if they did that, they ve already dismissed self-defense. if they haven t, they will be progressing to that soon. but the manslaughter instruction doesn t really turn on whether or not in this case george zimmerman was the aggressor, because there hasn t been any evidence of aggression. under the gibbs case, the supreme court said or the florida court said that aggression has to be physical in nature. following even using racial epithets does not constitute aggression that would warrant exclusion from the self-defense statute. there is no evidence of that.