narrative what that meant. so look, if we go out on the street, do a man on the street interview, what happens if roe v. wade goes away? a lot of people go abortion is illegal. pete: yeah. will: maximalist position, don t realize it goes to the states. my point is, back to this idea of what is happening in minnesota, the burden needs to now be shifted. the burden shifted. you need to explain your point of view. rachel: yeah. i think that s fair. i think that s a good point. pete: i was going to because when they re pressed on their point of view, because of the power of the eye borings lobby, they can t abortion lobby, they can t say anything other than nine months. almost every democrat when pressed what is the limit abortion is acceptable? all the way up until birth? they don t want to answer it. but they don t want to reject it either. will: yes. for years pete: that is very extreme
is done by russian aggression. do you know how many parents lost their sons and daughter on the frontlines? what is peace for them yeah, what do you read into this in terms of what he may o may not be willing to accept i any negotiations i think he is making strong point out the further this goes along, the mor hardened the people of ukraine will be on that maximalist position that he staked out in this ten point plan. he mentioned the parents o those who died on the fron lines. additionally, alex, it is th civilians, the children bein killed in these war criminal attacks back in the cities it is the rape in the tortur and the murder carried out b russian troops during th occupation of some of th biggest cities in ukraine.
if that quite aces moderate position, which shows that state courts cannot completely change the law in dramatic ways, well interpreting elections, but a federal court should be deferential to their interpretations. that would be significant, but not a radical game-changer of any kind. and will basically bring in this extreme textualists interpretation that has little support in constitutional history, and reach a more moderate result. it s interesting that the same dynamics seem to be going on in the recent case involving the web designer who didn t want to advertise weddings for gay couples. the maximalist position would say that anytime a religious person wants an exemption from anti discrimination laws, it should be able to take it. we are once again, justices kavanaugh, robin, barrett, seem to be grappling towards a more moderate compromised says that web designers are special. they re artist, but they re not like limousine drivers or other professions. and therefore, this is not
thinking that war v harper s but to change voting as we know it for all time, i am not sure that the court is really really interested in doing that. jeff, dahlia now and i had this conversation, and you actually introduced me to judge and he is a conservative. a lot of people, and this is an entirely, effect is not really partisan, it shouldn t be, it s looking like that on the supreme court, but it shouldn t be, but they re a lot of conservatives who say that this independent state legislator doctrine is a french interpretation of the constitution. s there are indeed, and as dahlia said, it looks like the majority of the court will agree. the maximalist position, as she identified, it doesn t seem to get a majority in the court, and that position would allow a legislature after the fact to change the results of an election. and instead, it is significant, as dahlia has said, that justices kavanaugh and barrett were going towards a moderate solution. you can imagine chief justic
you can t adopt a maximalist position and like rubio did say i want to protect every unborn child eventually, i have a lot of work to do, public persuasion on that, in the meantime, here is a limit i support that i support that is defensible and has public support and point at the other side for being extremist for supporting abortion in every circumstance with federal funding. that is what blake masters in arizona attempted to do. when he debuted this ad he tried to scrub his website. we can show before his website on the abortion issue was i m 100% pro life and put it up and he was a supporter of the federal personhood law. he got rid of that. his spokesperson said he believes everything that was on there before, but it feels like you know, they hit it on it slightly differently than marco rubio. what he is saying he supports in the ad was what was allowed