fe s reacting against what h we feels inside, which is the steady loss of his power as a man. the faster thatthe faster poa recedes, the more franticallys he asserts it. .e is raging against the dying of the light. the ligt these last embarrassing decisions are, in fact, hisroes. death throes. it s sad, really. it is reallunfortunately, whatt fo men also tends to happen to the systems they create. for the last 80 years, our world has been governe0 d by a system formed in the final months of world war two. its features.tures de define oue free and open global trade routes guaranteed by the g us navy, a universal currency called the dollarreme and overseeing it all p one supreme power, the world s largest economy, the united states of america.system it s been a great system in most ways, but for manyg th reasons, including the passage of time thate system is dying. what comes next is not entirely clear , but how to influence it to america s greatest possible advantage. gr
we should be wondering why it was so fast. i mean, look, most times and charles can agree or disagree with me. as a former prosecutor, when you get a verdict this fast, it s usually a verdict of guilty. this jury has salt through multiple weeks of testimony. this trial started with jury selection january 23rd, i want to say. it s been going more than 61 witnesses presented by the prosecutor. we heard from experts witnesses, we had cell phone evidence, blood spatter evidence. at the end of the day, i think what really moved the needle for the jury was the rebuttal closing from the prosecution. when the prosecutor got up and said, alex murdaugh kicked the person he loved the most, and it wasn t his wife. it wasn t his son. it was himself. and in order to preserve his lifestyle, his addiction, his financial fraud, he picked himself. and if that s what the jury heard last before they went into the jury room, i would not be surprised to see if the verdict is guilty. ellison ba
that s the essential right that all other rights defend. if you can t defend your family and property, you don t have any rights at all. your a slave by definition. you may be wondering in this moment of creeping authoritarianism, how is the right of self-defense doing in our country? we can give a long lecture. consider two shootings that took place in gas stations in the past year in the united states. the first shooting occurred around 2:00 p.m. october 6 in the state of missouri, a 23-year-old felon called javon taylor, a long criminal record, convictions for armed robbery, began threatening a female clerk because the gas station didn t carry the cigars that he wanted. that s when an off duty fireman decided to step in. he told taylor to leave the store. in response to that, taylor began threatening him and ran towards his s.u.v. outside. he followed him outside because he expected that taylor would retrieve a gun from the car. that s what he did. taylor pulled an illegal
which all other rights depend. if you can t defend yourself, te can t defend your family and your property, you don t have any rights at all. you re a l.. by definition. so you may be wondering in this moment of creeping authoritarianism, how is the right to self defense doing in our country? ou we can give some kind of long lecture, but instead, how about some examples? consider two shootings that took place at gas stations in the past year in the united states . the first shooting occurred around two p 2:0m.m on october a the state of missouri, a twentyo three year old felon called javon taylor with a long criminal record convictiontaylor armed robbery, for example, began threatening a female clerk, apparently becausn es st the gas station didn t carry the kind of cigars that he wanted. that s when an off firemanat sw called anthony santae, who was inside, decidehed to step in.or. he told javon taylor to leave ty the storloe. response to that, taylor began threatening h
pete: good morning, good morning. so great to be back. will: it is halloween on fox & friends this morning. we will be dressing up a little later in the show dressing up in our costumes. pete: how much input did we get into your costumes? the answer is zero. there is a little bit of confusion about who is what. rachel: i saw your outfit, they told me it was mine. i was like, how am i supposed to wear this? it was huge. they re like, then later on it was figured out that actually that was your outfit. pete: okay. i haven t even seen mine. will: i think i know what pete will be. i can t imagine you being that. [laughter]. by the way there was, we had a halloween parade, dog costumes. pete: was it a parade? will: it was not a parade. pete: may have been described as such. rachel: there is rachel s hunky boyfriend, our producer. will: her dog flapjack. rachel: her dog flapjack. will: didn t win. we had an instagram poll which dog had the halloween costume. the dog named tucke