Test, test test, test good afternoon. Welcome to the San Francisco board of supervisors land use and Economic Committee im scott wiener and supervisor kim and our clerk is lisa miller and i want to thank sfgovtv for broadcasting especially stacey and charles. Madam clerk any items yes. The items that are on the agenda will be announced later. Item number is a zoning map to create the restrict use district. And the author it supervisor cowen and the supervisor asked for an extension of september 30th. So well take Public Comment and ill be entertaining a motion to fine. My comment on one . Seeing none, Public Comment is closed to continue for two weeks. And well fact that without observation. Item 2 is an ordinance to authorize financing by special districts to bring the Service Buildings into policy. This is an effort to move it mr. Patrick lane i didnt and a good afternoon supervisors with the city of San Francisco. Before you say one of any pieces of legislation that are needed to ge
Five weeks in the worlds democracy. The case in the trial of the South African athlete Oscar Pistorius denies the murder of his girlfriend. Rwanda marks 20 years since the genocide where thousands were killed. Hello. Within the last few minutes, malaysian authorities have said theyre hopeful two separate signals picked up from the indian ocean are the missing plane. Its described as the most promising lead so far for the hunt of the plane that disappeared a month ago with 239 on board. The signals are detective for black box pings. That has to be confirmed. The second detection was held approximately 13 minutes. On this occasion, two distinct pings were audible. Significantly by houston consistent with trance missions from the cockpit data recorder. The chinese ship has detected similar signals twice, in line with measures consistent on fine and corroborating evidence. I urge all parties concerned to treat this information responsibly and give time and space for authorities to conduct
Like for example, the time that senator harris said that she believed the Sexual Misconduct allegations against joe biden or the time that she accused joe biden of coddling the reputation of segregationists come of those still need to be asked. Or the time that she all but called joe biden a racist on a primary debate stage and said she wouldnt be a senator if the people he praised had had their way. Or the time that in fact it came up often she cosponsored the radical Green New Deal in the senate or the time she wanted to ban red meat, plastic straws, ban oil, gas, and yes, she said it, joe has said it many times, we will prove it in a minute, fracking. Or the time, by the way, she called for gun confiscation Via Executive order if congress didnt act the way she wanted. And lets not forget the time that she publicly supported Court Packing. By the way, she again tonight refused to answer that question. I dont think thats going to go over well. For the time that she smeared judge kavan
I want to reriterate that commissioner alexander is right. We should not push for pushing sake. I reiterate we need criteria and process. And without that, the everbeing in place whether this request and the ripple affects that may come if this question is granted. We will run in the same problem. Does everybody have to go for a year and a half and convince 1 or more commissioners to experience we agree that is not the right way. I think if we are going to table this give it sufficient time may be the superintendent can tell us if not january may be sooner. That process can be made clear so that we reevaluate. Based on that. May be call the question to the motion. I definitely feel also tonight we are missing out on the inside of our other commissioners as well, too. Thats not anything to prevent us from voting and what we need it do if folks feel like we should move forward. I heard commissioner ward say she would like a cross with criteria before next years calendar is adoptd that is
Building inspection. Except when the presiding officer finds good cause to order the presentations otherwise, the order of presentation of an appeal shall be as follows a the appellant shall speak first and shall be allowed seven minutes to present relevant testimony and evidence. Then the permit holder, representatives of the department, board, commission or person from whose order the appeal is taken, and or other parties, shall be allowed seven minutes for presentation of relevant testimony and evidence. Three minutes for rebuttal shall be provided to all parties in this same order; b the board may request a departmental response at its own discretion. For rehearing requests and jurisdiction requests, each party shall be allowed three minutes to present testimony and evidence, with no rebuttal. Other persons desiring to speak before the board on an appeal may speak once for up to three minutes, unless the presiding officer further limits time uniformly zoom, please email or call the