Honorable [reading names] mrs. Megan buyer and the honorable john mayer junior buyer junior. Mrs. Rew peterson and mr. Andrew peterson and mrs. Mr. Craig peterson. Montgomery and mrs. Pauline montgomery. Ms. Cynthia horne and ms. Cassidy horne. And mrs. Nd mrs pamela ehrlich. Mr. Mark alexander. The honorable jack reed, u. S. Senator of rhode island, and mrs. Julia reed. The honorable gerald connolly, u. S. Representative, virginia, and mrs. Catherine smith. I am honored to be at the last state dinner. Tonight only, i pronounce my name cannoli, not connelly. Connolly. E and mrs. Rence pag lesa page. [reading names] mr. John rogers junior and ms. Marion brooks. Mr. Stephen hightower. Mr. Allen cello and mrs. Andrea solow. Lo and mrs. Andrea solo. [reading names] mr. Joseph del rosso and mrs. Ann del rosso. [reading names] mr. Thomas shannon junior. [reading names] the honorable jane harman and mr. Robert dickey. [reading names] ms. Colleen Mccain Nelson and mr. John nelson. [reading nam
I want to reriterate that commissioner alexander is right. We should not push for pushing sake. I reiterate we need criteria and process. And without that, the everbeing in place whether this request and the ripple affects that may come if this question is granted. We will run in the same problem. Does everybody have to go for a year and a half and convince 1 or more commissioners to experience we agree that is not the right way. I think if we are going to table this give it sufficient time may be the superintendent can tell us if not january may be sooner. That process can be made clear so that we reevaluate. Based on that. May be call the question to the motion. I definitely feel also tonight we are missing out on the inside of our other commissioners as well, too. Thats not anything to prevent us from voting and what we need it do if folks feel like we should move forward. I heard commissioner ward say she would like a cross with criteria before next years calendar is adoptd that is
Building inspection. Except when the presiding officer finds good cause to order the presentations otherwise, the order of presentation of an appeal shall be as follows a the appellant shall speak first and shall be allowed seven minutes to present relevant testimony and evidence. Then the permit holder, representatives of the department, board, commission or person from whose order the appeal is taken, and or other parties, shall be allowed seven minutes for presentation of relevant testimony and evidence. Three minutes for rebuttal shall be provided to all parties in this same order; b the board may request a departmental response at its own discretion. For rehearing requests and jurisdiction requests, each party shall be allowed three minutes to present testimony and evidence, with no rebuttal. Other persons desiring to speak before the board on an appeal may speak once for up to three minutes, unless the presiding officer further limits time uniformly zoom, please email or call the
Lazarus, acting chief building inspector with the department of building inspection. Except when the presiding officer finds good cause to order the presentations otherwise, the order of presentation of an appeal shall be as follows a the appellant shall speak first and shall be allowed seven minutes to present relevant testimony and evidence. Then the permit holder, representatives of the department, board, commission or person from whose order the appeal is taken, and or other parties, shall be allowed seven minutes for presentation of relevant testimony and evidence. Three minutes for rebuttal shall be provided to all parties in this same order; b the board may request a departmental response at its own discretion. For rehearing requests and jurisdiction requests, each party shall be allowed three minutes to present testimony and evidence, with no rebuttal. Other persons desiring to speak before the board on an appeal may speak once for up to three minutes, unless the presiding offi
Lazarus, acting chief building inspector with the department of building inspection. Except when the presiding officer finds good cause to order the presentations otherwise, the order of presentation of an appeal shall be as follows a the appellant shall speak first and shall be allowed seven minutes to present relevant testimony and evidence. Then the permit holder, representatives of the department, board, commission or person from whose order the appeal is taken, and or other parties, shall be allowed seven minutes for presentation of relevant testimony and evidence. Three minutes for rebuttal shall be provided to all parties in this same order; b the board may request a departmental response at its own discretion. For rehearing requests and jurisdiction requests, each party shall be allowed three minutes to present testimony and evidence, with no rebuttal. Other persons desiring to speak before the board on an appeal may speak once for up to three minutes, unless the presiding offi