without new varieties. reporter: dario chavez is trying to breed a better peach. each one of these is a pit from the fruit that we harvest from across. reporter: at the university of georgia, his peach team is matchmaking slivers from the pits of different varieties. their goal? a peach more resilient to georgia s changing climate. here, we re looking at high chill variety of peaches. reporter: but all good breeding takes time, and georgia is running out. it actually takes decades. reporter: the short answer is you re working on it? we re working on it. reporter: continuing to grow peaches is potentially at risk? it is potentially at risk. reporter: in his groves of unfruited trees those were killed. they didn t have the decency to fall off. reporter: lawton pearson worries about his family s future in peach farming. you really start to question whether this is a viable enterprise. reporter: a challenge both economic and existential. georgia, the no peac
the averages is about the many we need to have a crop. reporter: no margin for error? that s right, we have to come to the average every year and we can t. reporter: dario chavez is trying to breed a better peach. each one of these is actually a pit from the fruit we harvest from across that we make. reporter: at the university of georgia come his peach team is a matchmaking slivers from the pits of different varieties. their goal, a peach more resilient to georgia s changing climate. here we are looking at a high chill variety of peaches. reporter: but all good breeding takes time, and george is running out. it actually takes decades. reporter: you are working on it. we are working on it. continuing to grow ages is potentially a risk. it is a risk. reporter: in his fruits of the micros of unpolluted cheek know my trees. they did not have the decency to fall off. reporter: lawton pearson
institution. this fiction about the supreme court being a political and that they don t have relationships with people who are frequenting the court and have vested interest in how the court rules has always been somewhat of a lie. justice alito was nominated to the supreme court in part because he was an official in the reagan department of justice who wrote memos urging the courts to narrow roe v. wade before ultimately overruling it so that they wouldn t actually face backlash in the event the court overruled roe. and once he is on the court, leonard leo, the cofounder of the federal society who is actively selecting the judge is nominated by former president donald trump is basically matchmaking justice alito with billionaire benefactors to reward him for doing all the things they put him on the bench to do. this goes both ways, right? i think is holding them about this balls and strikes thing, julia riggleman, a very talented lawyer just elevated to the federal bench, the dist
been well warned that we saw on the specter in 2008. the balls and strikes, empires, no values, it s all nonsense, we all know that. it s very obvious. but like there is also no longer pretending but not wanting to actually have to do anything, any disclosing. it seems so untenable for the institution. this fiction about the supreme court being a political and that they don t have relationships with people who are frequenting the court and have vested interest in how the court rules has always been somewhat of a lie. justice alito was nominated to the supreme court in part because he was an official in the reagan department of justice who wrote memos urging the courts to narrow roe v. wade before ultimately overruling it so that they wouldn t actually face backlash in the event the court overruled roe. and once he is on the court, leonard leo, the cofounder of the federal society who is actively selecting the judge is nominated by former president donald trump is basically matchmakin