hearings? none of the no, there was an initial hearing, kind of an organizational hearing about how to proceed in january. but none of those nine hearings that were announced have been held publicly. the committee will tell you they ve interviewed some of those people privately, but the fact is they have had this fairly ambitious proposed hearing schedule and none of those hearings have been held. similarly, there were 12 very high-profile defense and intelligence community officials, current and former officials, who mr. gowdy announced he was going to depose in february. only one of those 12 has been interviewed so far by the committee. in the meantime, since the e-mail revelations came out there were 18 state department people added to their roster of witnesses. the evidence really does support the account that this shifted in march after the hillary clinton e-mail revelations. part of this also has been the fact that these interviews are happening, you know, behind closed doo
hillary clinton and others. podliska s lawyers say they have issued a cease and desist letter to gowdy because he is the one inappropriately releasing information about podliska s mediation and they expect to sue for wrongful termination. meanwhile, new york times has now detailed the extent to which the benghazi committee shifted its attention to hillary clinton s e-mails. joining me now, noah schreiber, a labor and workforce relations writer for the times. co-author of that piece. this is the paragraph that stood out to me in your piece. i will read. with the slow progress members have engaged with the standing committee engaged in social activities like a wine club nicknamed wine wednesdays, drinking from glasses imprinted with the words glacial pace, a dig at representative elijah e. cummins , democrat of maryland the committee s ranking member, major podliska said. mr. cummings used the term to question the speed of the committee s work. is this for real? yeah. we feel p
everybody thought hillary clinton was unbeatable, right? but we put together a benghazi special committee, a select committee. what are her numbers today? her numbers are dropping. why? because she s untrustable. first, house majority leader kevin mccarthy appeared to reveal the benghazi committee s real purpose was to damage hillary clinton. now a former investigator for the benghazi committee, major bradley podliska, an air force reservist and self-described conservative republican, says he was fired when he raised concerns that the committee s work had become too partisan towards clinton. as i ve stated, hillary clinton has a lot of explaining to do. we, however, did not need to shift resources to hyper focus on hillary clinton. i honestly do not believe this investigation was set up to go after hillary. i believe it shifted that way. the victims families are not going to get the truth. and that s the most unfortunate thing about this. and i know this because the nine months of
releasing information about podliska s mediation and they expect to sue for wrongful termination. meanwhile, new york times has now detailed the extent to which the benghazi committee shifted its attention to hillary clinton s e-mails. joining me, noah schreiber, a labor and workforce relations writer for the times. this is the paragraph that stood out to me in your piece. i will read. with the slow progress members of the standing committee engaged in social activities like a wine club nicknamed wine wednesdays, drinking from glasses imprinted with the words glashial pace, a dig at representative elijah e. cummins , democrat of maryland the committee s ranking member, major podliska said. mr. cummings used the term to question the speed of the committee s work. is this for real? yeah. we feel pretty about good about it. certainly major podliska is the source. but we asked multiple people about it. we feel like it stood up. one of the things that seems to be the case here is
letter to gowdy because he is the one inappropriately releasing information about podliska s mediation and they expect to sue for wrongful termination. meanwhile, new york times has now detailed the extent to which the benghazi committee shifted its attention to hillary clinton s e-mails. joining me, noah schreiber, a labor and workforce relations writer for the times. this is the paragraph that stood out to me in your piece. i will read. with the slow progress members of the standing committee engaged in social activities like a wine club nicknamed wine wednesdays, drinking from glasses imprinted with the words glacial pace, a dig at representative elijah e. cummins , democrat of maryland the committee s ranking member, major podliska said. mr. cummings used the term to question the speed of the committee s work. is this for real? yeah. we feel pretty about good about it. certainly major podliska is the source. but we asked multiple people about it. we feel like it stood up.