like. i would say i don t and none of us do but we re learning. we share the city with different social and culture groups and they re introducing what a landmark is to us every year and that s the exciting park about san francisco. but unfortunately, sometimes people are focusing on the city as a play of profit, of money making and not as a resident. i think the question raised in north beach question is interesting in illustrating. by voting to go ahead with a proposed library, you opened up other preservation questions, the view corridor, baseball field. what are you going to do about those? these are new issues. if perhaps you listened to the h.p.c., you wouldn t have these two. solve one problem maybe but have two new problems ma may come back to haunt you. thank you. now it s time to sing. i have graphics too, please. what happened to the city we knew when you were landing and dealing in the item like you do iester you,iester city me yesterday where did it go that
of the most popular destinations in the world. we basically stayed the same and that s what we like about it. i want to you think about that. thank you. thank you. although i would disagree about city staff, i think they re all incredibly committed to the city and a lot of them can be making a lot more money in the private sector and they re doing it because they love san francisco. i respectfully disagree with that comment. several or newcomers to san francisco also. next speaker. good afternoon supervisors, my name is marilyn cohen. i simply want to address what a wonderful idea it is to turn golden gate park into an historic district. the current president of the rec and park commission has stated that parks are assets from which we must extract value. i think most san franciscoans would disagree with that. they don t see parks as capital from which business plans should be developed. the director of the rec and park commission has made numerous, misleading stateme
we have a productive and proactive dialogue rather than forcing activists like myself to hire a lawyer and sue or something like that, be better and more productive all together to have a process who had a dialogue in our city agencies who take into historics. my own experience has been rec and park has many balls it juggles and often drops historic ball. for example, music concourse before it was a landmark. initial proposal was rip out trees and put gay rath between two museums. we would not have a music concourse if that had gone forward. thank you. thank you very much. katherine howard, golden gate park preservation alliance. golden gate park has attracted those who view it as open land available for their my favorite developmental projects. the effort to stem the flood of development in rec and park in 1998 they developed golden gate park master plan. huffer, this plan is not really followed by the department, new develop projects are constantly being proposed. we ne
a new shopping center coming, we need your help to make sure that we can coexist and survive. that includes the road at park merced, that they want to build from 19th avenue, but we need more help than that as possible. they re going to take a bus stop in front of our shopping center that brings a lot of people, use that boston out use that bus stop. we would like to see that relocated. we would like directions to our shopping center on this big property. and we just really need your help. our future is in your hands. thank you. president miguel: thank you. the other one, bernie. ok, thank you. thank you for your endurance. there are two points to the performance analysis that need to be revised. one is we have made alternative proposals which have not been responded to for resident ownership of the project, second, there is the general plan compliance that protect social equity, which is your duty to conserve, such as cumulative impact of capital budgets that have not be
shopping center on this big property. and we just really need your help. our future is in your hands. thank you. president miguel: thank you. the other one, bernie. ok, thank you. thank you for your endurance. there are two points to the performance analysis that need to be revised. one is we have made alternative proposals which have not been responded to for resident ownership of the project, second, there is the general plan compliance that protect social equity, which is your duty to conserve, such as cumulative impact of capital budgets that have not been properly done in terms of sustainability of our infrastructure, citywide, at to which they have made a partial move. there is a housing element to protect the long-term and permit below market residents compliance for the 90% of our residents who cannot afford to either rat at market value to begin with. thank you. president miguel: elizabeth, vivian. good evening. my name is elizabeth. i am a small business under a