Malma and he suggested i bring it up and that the board sr. That amendment. Thank you. Based on what the appellant has asked, i have a question now for the deputy City Attorney, while many of us find what the appellant has asked to be quite sympathetic, under the law that weve passed is that what is in front of us from a jurisdictional standpoint is that we can only consider reductions or adjustments or waivers of the fee if we find that there hasnt been a nexus between the impact of the dwomment in the amount of the fee charged. Im not sure whether we have discretion beyond that. If i could ask that question to the City Attorney . John from the City Attorneys office, yes, thats correct. The matter before the board today is just the waiver or reduction based on the standard that you indicated. Er i think the appellant was making a general request to the board of supervisors that if a board member were interested in sponsoring legislation that would make an amendment to the fee deferral
For the appellant for coming forward in my district, just more than anything, i think to continue this consistency sake, understand that this is not going to be a winning vote, but i think to me, this is the law of unintended consequences, again, we have someone whos in a more dire Economic Situation and in particular because this is a six unit tic building being kind of quasi forced to convert where they are no longer eligible for the process, these are exactly the people i believe we need to support. I realize theres not the general sentiment here on the board but i will be supporting the resident from district 2 and so but given that, maybe someone else can make the motion because i know its not going to be a winner here today. Okay, is there someone who could make the motion . Supervisor breed . Okay, let me just make sure were at the right place. This is item number 27, correct . It is both item 23 through 25 as well as items 27 through im sorry, youre right. Theyre mixed a little
Approve the construction o f a cafe in the west garden of the academy of sciences in golden gate park. Supervisor mar . Thank you, president chiu, i want to acknowledge that its been a pleasure working on this, the staff of the California Academy of science and is we have with this the general manager and kevin, monalele that have been wonderful to work with. The academy of sciences is beginning tomorrow, it is the season for science exhibit, but this is a project that is a low profiled structure which includes a cafe, it isnt really an expansion of the site but replacement of a temporary structure with a perm nept and attractive building, it allows us to see this sculpture thats hanging like floating like a cloud above it, its called where land meets the sea and it will be much more visible with this new structure. The project will enrich the experience hosting the academy which lists countless families, not only from district 1 but throughout the city, i want to thank the land use su
This is item number 27, correct . It is both item 23 through 25 as well as items 27 through im sorry, youre right. Theyre mixed a little bit. Theyre mixed, items 2325 is related to apartment number 2 and items 27 through 29 are related to apartment number 5. Sorry. So, i would like to make a motion to move item 19, table item 20 and 21 supervisor breed, i think weve already resolved that. The motion i believe youre thinking of making is move item 23 to deny the appeal with regards to apartment 2. Table 24 and 25 and then move item 27 to deny the appeal for apartment number 5, and then table item number 28 and 29. Okay, sorry. Because on the screen, its different and up here, its different, so i would like to make a motion to move item 23, table item 24 and 25, move item 27, table item 28 and 29. Supervisor breed just made a motion, seconded by supervisor campos. Any discussion . None. So, colleagues, unless theres any further comment, lets take a roll call vote on supervisor breeds mot
To roll call for introductions, madam clerk. Yes, mr. President , supervisor breed is first to introduce new items. Thank you, today im introducing an amendment to the tic bypass legislation that the board passed earlier this year and the in the past couple of months, weve seen a number of appeals of the conversion, bypass fee and these appeals have by in large been solely on the basis of financial hardship, regardless of how sympathetic the appeals are, there is no obl gases of the law for a fee waiver, the board can simply not do it, part 3196. 4j1 of the subdivision code say that is a project applicant may appeal to the board of supervisors for reduction, adjustment or waiver of the requirements based upon the absence of any reasonable relationship or nexus between the impact of the development and the amount of the fee charged. In other words, the appellant must refute the 2011 nexus report done on behalf of the city by ketha martin and associates and this is a steep climb and with