Is im sorry to my right is supervisor aaron peskin and to my left is supervisor president london breed and i want to thank our committee i would like to thank our committees clerk, erica major and also recognize the staff of sfgovtv, Charles Kremenak who make our meetings available online, as well as transcript. Madam clerk, any announcements. Please silence all cell phones. Thank you, madam clerk and can you please call the first item. Item no. 1 is ordinance amending the environment code to adjust the incentive in the Solar Energy Incentive program. The author of this item is president london breed, if you would like to make opening comments. Yes, thank you i know we have Laurie Mitchell here who will be making a presentation shortly, but i just wanted to make a few comments about your go Solar Program in the city. Were making a few technical amendments to this program today. Despite the fact that other utilities around the state are ramping down their incentive like the city of palo
Statistics. We have got some terrible hotspots that not being addressed. 1500 valencia, which im you send a pco there within about two hours and giving out 1012 tickets. Day after day month after month, it was last april, it was this the summer. The only differences weve now changed the ticketing. Instead of giving the redthe bus ticket thats 288, we are giving a red zone ticket for 110. I dont understand how that is supposed to change ongoing bad behavior. The white stones, sounds fine but the metrics are not catching the traffic problems adjacent to these. When they are on arterials which are shared by muni buses the muni buses cannot get through because of the obstruction of traffic that goes on day after day. I live on a street with a habit. Thank you next speaker, please. [calling Public Comment cards] hello. Im in wellington. I may San Francisco native and 26 year resident of castro street. I just want to say that if this Program Continues there are some issues that need to be ad
Lowincome incentive they get an additional incentivelevel if they qualify to be low income. No, i understand that you provide additional incentives, but what qualifies . So we work with the Mayors Office of economic development, and we use the hud guidelines in San Francisco. So for a family of one, its about 60,000 a year, and for four, i think its about 80,000. You use the hud ami definition . Yes for San Francisco. And what amilevel and below did you select . So we get guidelines from the Mayors Office of economic and workforce development. So the numbers that were using today for household of one is 68,000. For a household of four, its 98,000 so roughly like 90 of area Median Income and below, is that the threshold maximum income . I can doublecheck and we can can get an answer. I know its ami, but what ami, 90 . 60 of ami and below . Im not sure. Its median. I can get you that answer and can definitely come back to you on that. Okay. So were talking about middleincome households.
Can you call item one, please . Yes. Resolution retroactively approving the city and county of San Francisco Refugee Services plan for the fiscal years, 15, 16, and 16, 17. Great, and i understand that suzy smith is here who is the Deputy Director for the policy and planning for the Human Services agency. Thank you. Good moerrning i am joined ba few people, the refugee coordinator and two providers gladys and nancy from the Lynn Institute, after a say a few brief words they will say a few words about their programming. The item before you is a resolution approving San Francisco federal fiscal year, 15, 16, and 16, 17s Refugee Services plans. These are submitted annually for the funding. San francisco is one of eight counties, that receives refugee federal refugee assistance funding and administered through the California Department of social services and the 15, 16, allocation was totalled 214,000, and the 16, 17, allocation totalled 168,000 dollars. And the funds are used for newly ar
Municipal buildings that didnt previously have them including city hall and established a base minimum price of 25. It was not a ceiling. The legislation that is sitting in front of me is very clear and by the way theres a study, libby stifle cited with this project and shows sales as high as 37. 50 and want that on the record and with that i am happy to vote for the please call the next item three and four as amended. Supervisor tang. I want to ditto comments made earlier as well. I think that seeing what has transpired this week could have been frustrating for you and i understand that but just the information that has come to light really heights something that we want to work on together moving forward longterm for broader policies around the arrangements so with that i am happy to support these two items moving forward to the full board. I dont know if there was a motion made or if i should make the motion. Go for it. I will make a motion for items 3 and four as recommended with a