the merits at all. it s not terribly unreasonable especially after mark pomerant published this book. the judge loves mark pomerantz s book so much tha she quotes it at great lengt in her opinion and in detail and she shockingly distorts it in don trump s favor the judge falsely presents thi from mark pomerantz s book ultimately in march 2023 bragged it, of course, indic president trump, bringing th zombie theory back from th dead once again. notice that bracket, changin the chance of that word. there is a federal judge in written opinion, clearly attributing to mark pomerant on page 209 of this book, statement about what alvin bragg did in march of 2023
resigned, he wrote a book abou that experience, which mr. bragg did not appreciate chairman jordan now wants mark pomerantz to testify on th record and he wants to know two things, one, what were the interna deliberations not to indic trump back when mr. pomerant was running the show because that information could presumably be very useful to a group of people who don t want trump to be indicted, in a broader fraud case and two, mr. jordan wants to find out what the d.a. s offic did have on donald trump and his potentially fraudulent business dealings. because again, that informatio could presumably be useful to group of people who might want to mounted offense, if mr. trump is indicted in a broader fraud case so the accountability road sho continues, and so does the accountability road show continues , apparently now mr. bragg s office, sued
it s not terribly unreasonable especially after mark pomerant published this book. the judge loves mark pomerantz s book so much that she quote it at great length in he opinion and in detail and sh shockingly distorts it in do donald trump s favor the judge falsely presents thi from mark pomerantz s book ultimately in march 2023 bragged it, of course, indic president trump, bringing th zombie theory back from th dead once again. notice that bracket, changin the chance of that word. there is a federal judge in written opinion, clearly attributing to mark pomerant on page 209 of this book, statement about what alvin bragg did in march of 2023 the book was published februar
movement to a halt some people like congressman jim jordan, i is now chair of the hous judiciary committee, and hea of the ironically name subcommittee on th weaponization of the federal government chairman jordan is doing something fairly unusual, mayb even unconstitutional. to put a stop to all thi accountability he is directly interfering i currently the only crimina indictment against donal trump. in attempt to inject healthy a hefty dose of very questionabl congressional oversight into mr. bragg s investigation, chairman jordan is trying to force attorney mark pomerant to testify before congress now, if you remember, pomerant was a manhattan prosecutor who once led the investigation int the fraud of the trump organization, under th previous manhattan d. a. cy vance mr. pomerantz resigned early last year when the new dea alvin bragg, decided not t seek an indictment against trump for that fraud at that time and after, mr. pomerantz
about this really needn t worry, because if alvin bragg loses this lawsuit and mark pomerant has to testify, i actually think that that testimony is going to be quite good for alvin bragg. it will make him look, i think very fair. a loss is actually a win. andrew weissmann, as, always thank you so much. coming up next, the suprem court central on wednesday whether to pervert the fda s approval of the drug, the firs major case on abortion tha these conservative supreme court has heard since they voted to overturn roe v. wade. minnesota senator amy klobucha joins us next. trelegy for copd. birds flyin high, you know how i feel. breeze driftin on by. .you know how i feel.