Thats to be expected. The alternative, however, is simply untenable. At home, another four years of Donald Trumps chaotic leadership, this time focused on advancing the dangerous goals of project 2025 will hurt real, everyday people and waken our sacred institutions. Richard, which are the reasons who have not stood up yet, who served in the Trump Administration, who could actually make a difference in terms of persuading those very few, unpersuadable voters who are left . And do you expect any more of them to stand up between now and november . I mean, theres the former Vice President who has, shall we say, a certain physical and political incentive to stand up, given how he was do you think hes going to do it . No. Look, i think if people were going to stand up, theyve had now, shall we say, several years to do it. Several people simply have not. Disagree with me or not, but how much of a difference will it make . Its certainly not going to shake trumps base. Im not sure many of thes
The cost already off the charts. More than the gdp of some entire countries. And the dramatic rescue of a 52yearold israeli hostage grabbed from a tunnel in southern gaza, raising new hopes for the 108 people still being held by hamas. What were learning about how the idf pulled it off. So much to get to but we start in georgia where democrats are suing the State Election Board over new rules they say will sow chaos and uncertainty election day. The rules allow Election Boards in 159 counties to make what they call reasonable inquiries about the vote count before certifying the results, but the rules dont explain what reasonable actually means. The lawsuit alleges that even individual Board Members can have the power to delay certification while they hunt for Election Irregularities and then a Battleground State like georgia that could mean holding up not just the state results, but potentially, then, National Results as well. All of it coming as trump keeps fueling the idea that the o
Characterized by an uncontrollable or insane impulsion to wander. So that was the problem. It wasnt they disliked being enslaved or yearned for freedom and basic humanity, no, no, the problem according to Samuel Cartwright was that black people as a group were inherently defective. They were maniacs, always running away. Thats what he said. 107 years later it is embarrassing to repeat something this stupid out loud. So obviously insane. But heres what you should know. It was taken very seriously at the time and so was Samuel Cartwright. Cartwright was not a french character at all. He was a nationally prominent physician, a highranking officer from fairfax, virginia, peered he went to penn medical school. He was a credentialed man of science, a man who commanded the respect of the country. 50 years after the civil war, one of this nations leading medical dictionaries continued an entry for this. So with retrospect, we would call Samuel Cartwright a bigot, which He Undoubtably was. But
Characterized by an uncontrollable or insane impulsion to wander. So that was the problem. It wasnt they disliked being enslaved or yearned for freedom and basic humanity, no, no, the problem according to Samuel Cartwright was that black people as a group were inherently defective. They were maniacs, always running away. Thats what he said. 107 years later it is embarrassing to repeat something this stupid out loud. So obviously insane. But heres what you should know. It was taken very seriously at the time and so was Samuel Cartwright. Cartwright was not a french character at all. He was a nationally prominent physician, a highranking officer from fairfax, virginia, peered he went to penn medical school. He was a credentialed man of science, a man who commanded the respect of the country. 50 years after the civil war, one of this nations leading medical dictionaries continued an entry for this. So with retrospect, we would call Samuel Cartwright a bigot, which He Undoubtably was. But
Characterized by an uncontrollable or insane impulsion to wander. So that was the problem. It wasnt they disliked being enslaved or yearned for freedom and basic humanity, no, no, the problem according to Samuel Cartwright was that black people as a group were inherently defective. They were maniacs, always running away. Thats what he said. 107 years later it is embarrassing to repeat something this stupid out loud. So obviously insane. But heres what you should know. It was taken very seriously at the time and so was Samuel Cartwright. Cartwright was not a french character at all. He was a nationally prominent physician, a highranking officer from fairfax, virginia, peered he went to penn medical school. He was a credentialed man of science, a man who commanded the respect of the country. 50 years after the civil war, one of this nations leading medical dictionaries continued an entry for this. So with retrospect, we would call Samuel Cartwright a bigot, which He Undoubtably was. But