mechanism. when you want tv programming on their time and not some single time. host: and we re going to have to leave it there. sorry we re out of time. michael calabrese, david donovan, both on the spectrum advisory committee for the commerce department. thank you for being on the communicators. c-span.org/ the communicators is our website. you can find us on this bookshelf for this call to spectrum if you d like to look at that for yourself you can find it hyperlinks at that site. thanks for being with us. host: we can t presume justice stevens prevision or experience that i suggested a nominee who i believe embodies the same excellence, independence, integrity and passion for the lost and you can ultimately provide that same kind of leadership on the court. our solicitor general and my friend elena kagan. with a supreme court justice in the news, learn more about the nation s highest court from those who observed on the bench in c-span s latest book, the suprem
i think it s critical that we ough with that pledge to help the countries that desperately need i but also to build crelity that wl be that s my introductory comments and look forward to hearing what bill has to say. [ applause ] i think there s got to be a clean energy politically correct way of saying that. in this case it s bringing coals to west virginia or china. because that s really at some level the heart of the story o whe it starts in both countries. st going back for second, i do want to say that ken s work has really been half breaking in preparing for this i read- international and policy. and n swn congressional testimony last year, last fall. i start this with ideology or political ins. i will be a little bit more down in the weeds both of which are in fast forward as ken mentioned which wi be out this friday. from that we produce just under 6 billion tons of carbon dioxide a year. china produces 90% of their and by 2050, in order to com we need to get global
to begin with. eight years ago the age of 44 this mother of two was diagnosed with lung cancer specifically it had already metastasized to her brain. normally this would be a death sentence despite surgery, radiation, chemotherapy the cancer continued its deadly march moving into her liver and pancreas. she kept on fighting and in early 2003 she enrolled in a trial of a drug that is a new gm based drug for cancer based on a molecular understanding of what has gone wrong in certain cases of lung cancer. after she started the drug, most of her metastases vanished. look at the ct scans. this was the original one. in 2002 all of those areas are cancer in her liver. just six months later all but one is gone and today there is no evidence of cancer in her liver at all. why doesn t his work in all cases? in her case america s recovery. she is seven and a half-years-old with no clear signs of liver and her cancer in her liver, lung or pancreas. does this drug only work in about on