fallout might that have for those power plants that they all the stress test? we talked about this because the matter of responsibility. what happened in japan is of interest to the entire world. and it has now nothing to do with what happened at chernobyl. it was the highest ever earthquake known by japan and a nuclear power plant resisted the earthquake. the safety mechanisms resisted what the problem lies. but they were drowned by a torrential way which put a hole into the cooling systems. the problem in japan had to do with tsunamis. this problem will not apply to landlocked countries. countries that have had never had to deal with a tsunami. having said that, we decided to suspect subject all of our power plants to a safety test. live also agreed we have also agreed that the energy mix is something that comes under the sovereignty of member states. some have opted for nuclear energy, some of the. those who have opted for nuclear energy, the commission will set th
send us your tweets and we will read them. coverage of the nato-u.s. relationship in libya. allied forces hit a libyan jet that ventured into the air. taking a look at the washington post coverage. they are starting out with obama pressed for clarity over libya. coming from both parties in congress, as well as others, to get some sense of where the u.s. is going with this. let s get to the phones and hear what you think. lydia in maryland. democrats line. caller: i think it is great he is turning over command of the no-fly zone to nato. he said the united states would not be in the lead and it is about time it takes responsibility. more of the gulf states are contributing airplanes to the no-fly zone. i saw last night that night thatqatar, united arab emirates, contributing planes to the no- fly zone. that is great. they can do that. since the united states does not taking the lead and attacking another muslim country. host: janet in new york on the independent line. goo
to begin with. eight years ago the age of 44 this mother of two was diagnosed with lung cancer specifically it had already metastasized to her brain. normally this would be a death sentence despite surgery, radiation, chemotherapy the cancer continued its deadly march moving into her liver and pancreas. she kept on fighting and in early 2003 she enrolled in a trial of a drug that is a new gm based drug for cancer based on a molecular understanding of what has gone wrong in certain cases of lung cancer. after she started the drug, most of her metastases vanished. look at the ct scans. this was the original one. in 2002 all of those areas are cancer in her liver. just six months later all but one is gone and today there is no evidence of cancer in her liver at all. why doesn t his work in all cases? in her case america s recovery. she is seven and a half-years-old with no clear signs of liver and her cancer in her liver, lung or pancreas. does this drug only work in about on