Market street tunnel, with want to advance, because the repair and replacement needs for the first two and the long term relief for the downtown capacity and constraints and it is required for a network of service in San Francisco. And it is endorsement and the Regional Rail plan and it will be required for us to consider 24hour service. And a second tube is a massive advancement and technically and politically, and financially. And as a precurser we could look at increasing capacity, under the bay, with something less complex. Could i just ask a billion dollar question, approximately what, so this is not until 2050 or beyond, but what would be the cost of that even compared to like a high speed rail project that we are now in the midst of . We dont know yet, we want to actually dig deeper into the question, and try to understand things like you know, commissioner yees question about the alignment, that would have dramatic influence on the cost. And so we need to study this further. Bu
Of the video gamish impacts but that would be an interest to me to see how that budget czar process works and what other technology that we can use as well. Yeah, we thought it was innovative to put together what we did and it did report back on benefits and so we looked at air quality and congestion, and other concerns that the people would have, and equity as an example. And so it reported back immediately, so you could understand what your investments bought in terms of projects and the results in terms of benefits. I will just, say that on that mtc and in the meetings right there at the bart station and i know that it used to be part of china town, with a lot of affordable and low Income Housing and the impact on the neighbors when the bart station goes in will be of interest to me as well. Thank you. So, we intend to report to the board on the recommendations for the projects to advance for the further review and that completes my presentation and i am happy to answer any question
Concept and we had the people start with what sources of money would you like to commit to improving service, and it would be sales tax or higher bbart fares. Could i ask to see how density would be impacted by how the lines go to the different areas and that level of understanding not only the transportation connections but also other impacts would be useful and i dont know if our, i think that there was some of that gis technology, and more of the video gamish impacts but that would be an interest to me to see how that budget czar process works and what other technology that we can use as well. Yeah, we thought it was innovative to put together what we did and it did report back on benefits and so we looked at air quality and congestion, and other concerns that the people would have, and equity as an example. And so it reported back immediately, so you could understand what your investments bought in terms of projects and the results in terms of benefits. I will just, say that on tha
Investment trade offs in those three categories and developing recommendations for the board consideration. This shows you bart key capitol priorities and our general outline is what we called the big three, and the state of good repair, the capacity, or the Stations Program and expansion, and so going back to the big three for a second and a year ago the board defined the new fleet, hayward maintenance complex and the system as the First Priority and we have substantial priorities for the three projects. We have the number of investments of the number four of what we called the Stations Program. And so we have disstilled the remaining three Investment Choices and the state of good repair and capacity and expansion, and expansion in that context involves both new quarters and infill stations. I want to note that an expansion corridor in the bart service area may not be served by bart technology and we are looking at a time line of 30 to 50 years for some of this, and seeking to inform
Three categories and developing recommendations for the board consideration. This shows you bart key capitol priorities and our general outline is what we called the big three, and the state of good repair, the capacity, or the Stations Program and expansion, and so going back to the big three for a second and a year ago the board defined the new fleet, hayward maintenance complex and the system as the First Priority and we have substantial priorities for the three projects. We have the number of investments of the number four of what we called the Stations Program. And so we have disstilled the remaining three Investment Choices and the state of good repair and capacity and expansion, and expansion in that context involves both new quarters and infill stations. I want to note that an expansion corridor in the bart service area may not be served by bart technology and we are looking at a time line of 30 to 50 years for some of this, and seeking to inform the boards priority decisions a