church, all right, was libel to this lady because the lady committed a sin in the church s eyes. she was living with a guy or something like that. the church, the pastor went on the pulpit, up to the pulpit and said she is a sinner and named her. marianne gun. the courts ruled that that preacher, because he targeted her intentionally inflicted emotional distress and that church lost. what court was it? bill: this is oklahoma. yeah. it s not the u.s. supreme court. bill: it s not a federal case. that s the problem. no. bill: it s the targeted nature of it? there is no case on point here. the question is it s not whether it s targeted. the question is whether you can have there is a tort called intentional infliction of emotional distress. the question is whether that can apply when you are talking about speech. that s essentially what they did. bill: that s what happened here. you know what will happen if the court says yes to that, with the supreme court. that s o
church, all right, was libel to this lady because the lady committed a sin in the church s eyes. she was living with a guy or something like that. the church, the pastor went on the pulpit, up to the pulpit and said she is a sinner and named her. marianne gun. the courts ruled that that preacher, because he targeted her intentionally inflicted emotional distress and that church lost. what court was it? bill: this is oklahoma. yeah. it s not the u.s. supreme court. bill: it s not a federal case. that s the problem. no. bill: it s the targeted nature of it? there is no case on point here. the question is it s not whether it s targeted. the question is whether you can have there is a tort called intentional infliction of emotional distress. the question is whether that can apply when you are talking about speech. that s essentially what they did. bill: that s what happened here. you know what will happen if the court says yes to that, with the supreme court. that s o
church, all right, was libel to this lady because the lady committed a sin in the church s eyes. she was living with a guy or something like that. the church, the pastor went on the pulpit, up to the pulpit and said she is a sinner and named her. marianne gun. the courts ruled that that preacher, because he targeted her intentionally inflicted emotional distress and that church lost. what court was it? bill: this is oklahoma. yeah. it s not the u.s. supreme court. bill: it s not a federal case. that s the problem. no. bill: it s the targeted nature of it? there is no case on point here. the question is it s not whether it s targeted. the question is whether you can have there is a tort called intentional infliction of emotional distress. the question is whether that can apply when you are talking about speech. that s essentially what they did. bill: that s what happened here. you know what will happen if the court says yes to that, with the supreme court. that s o