they could be charged for allowing hate - speech on their platforms. there s such an extra debate i here about how whether there are platforms or publishers. i if they are deemed as publishers, | they should absolutely be charged. if someone says what| marchioness rashford and jadon sancho have said, they would be put it away i just back to the point - about the other things that get said on social media, - which the tech giants are very quick at taking down. if a football fan had tweeted a picture of the players, - taken off the television - or on his iphone, and posted on social media, twitter would ve taken it down within seconds. - so, this feeling that. there is a feeling particularlyl amongst the players that they are not acting quickly enough. but they also use social media and they do see there s an upside to it. i just think a lot of newspapers wouldn t, for example,
can find that the tech giant, - can find that the tech giant, 10% can find that the tech giant, 10% of can find that the tech giant, 10% of their can find that the tech giant, 10% of their annual- can find that the tech giant, 10% of their annual blur- can find that the tech giant, j 10% of their annual blur and over 10% of their annual blur and over and 10% of their annual blur and over and they 10% of their annual blur and over and they have - 10% of their annual blur and over and they have been - over and they have been indicated over and they have been indicated over and they have been indicated an- over and they have been indicated an annual. indicated an annual turnover indicated an annual turnover. could - indicated an annual turnover. could be - indicated an annual- turnover. could be charged for allowing turnover. could be charged for allowing hate turnover. could be charged for allowing hate speech - turnover. could be charged for allowi