the canadian border this after their lawyer claimed they were not in fact on the run. here to discuss fox news contributor and constitutional law expert jonathan turley. great to talk to you this morning. thank you. will: you and i need to look at this legally. there is certainly a moral discussion to take place about the parents culpability in this instance but as to their legal culpability jonathan, what do you see right now? charges of involuntary manslaughter is, that going to hold? well, that s a very good question. substantial challenges on the trial and the appellate level. i have been working through the manslaughter provision on my blog this morning because it s not a perfect fit. michigan decided that it did not want to enact a law on access of children to firearms recently this seems to be a work around. under that law, you don t need
interacting in this really fake way that isn t really relational is much more common and i think there is something there. it s really hard to get to that you are right, will, it s really hard. will: something really hard to get to we re talking about red flags and where we can quickly place blame. i think there is going to be difficulty on the legal charges towards these parents because of the lack of one particular piece of evidence that clearly screamed you failed, parents. it s possible let s do it text don t do it text gets to the timing. earlier i spoke to jonathan turley about involume man slaughter charges and whether or not there is a strong case at this point against the parents. i think there s going to be substantial challenges on the appellate level. i have been working through the manslaughter provision on my blog this morning. because it s not a perfect fit. we re going to have to look at what they knew about their son.