in our society in the west today people who obviously hate our societies. you see it everywhere, you mentioned some of the people i find myself debating these days. you can predict with 100% accuracy what they re going to say on any subject. the people who for instance have spent recent months trying to riled up their audience of malcontents against israel. the people who try to riled up people in the course of the palestinians of gaza. they are always the same people who turn out on the streets of america in protest against america and everything to do with america. the exact same people who live on this trigger where every opportunity that they have two different america. they will do it. it is the same across the west
allegiance, the coronation, the realm did so, and regina was sung out in latin, and king charles is trying to make it more of the people and some people have decided this is some appalling, you know, treading on their toes. the fact is just as we here live in an republic, in the u.k. it s a constitutional monarchy and there are people who don t like it, they are free to say they don t like it and swear allegiance to their pets if they like, but the royal family has survived 1,000 years and i think it will keep going a lot longer. than the malcontents will. we ll have live coverage. o dark 30, smitty. looking forward to it. i ll be at the derby thinking
job, or would not do the job. coldest behavior with conspiracy theories. these are the primary witnesses, who you said, witnessed nothing. they are not whistleblowers, they are malcontents who could not cut it at the fbi. what do you make of this, frank? and as any of this surprise you? i am not surprised, except, we should all understand what the so-called weaponization subcommittee is about. it s not playing to the general public. the audience for this is the far right media platform. to play it every night and repeat the mantra. institutions are bad. there is a deep state here. don t you see what jim jordan has produced today. the reality, of course, as you said, we had three so called fbi whistleblower s come out, all fired or retired. one of them who was fired, in part because he refused to take a covid vaccine, the other one walked away from the swat team assignment who arrested
nothing. it s actually i mean, if somebody wrote a novel about how to completely mess up an investigation on capitol hill and run as incompetent a set of depositions and interviews with utterly unreliable witnesses, this would be it. it actually is amazing that they would actually find these kinds of witnesses. malcontents that left the fbi because they couldn t do the job or wouldn t do the job. serious issues of, you know, almost cultish behavior in terms of conspiracy theories and more troubling than that with respect to january 6th itself, perhaps lending support to its direction, and these are their primary witnesses who, as you said, have witnessed nothing.
so they re not whistleblowers, they re malcontents who couldn t cut it at the fbi. what is the democratic strategy? you ve called them out. it seems like the weaponization of bill barr and donald trump and especially what we ve learned from the durham probe is ripe for examination. absolutely. right? i mean, can you i know you re in the minority. what is the ability to do the stated mission of this committee? well, i think we have a role to sort of call out the republicans, as we re doing right now, when they when they go awry, which seems to be with great frequency. and to be truth tellers, right? to have a truth squad as the democratic minority in reminding everybody what the real weaponization was. one of your panelists earlier cited if you want weaponization, look no further than jeffrey clark, and i think that s